Is There A Decent Democrat Left In America?
Posted: Sep 27, 2018 12:01 AM
The attempted character assassination of Judge Brett Kavanaugh has brought out the worst in Democrats, every Democrat, everywhere. They’ve convicted a good and decent man of things he wasn’t even falsely accused of, so desperate are progressives to stop someone who believes the Constitution means what it says from sitting on the Supreme Court. From elected officials to unelected Democrats with media credentials, the last two weeks have exposed the Democratic Party as a gaggle of guttersnipes willing to destroy a man for the “crime” of disagreeing with them politically. After watching this unfold, you really have to wonder one thing: Is there a single decent, honest Democrat left in the United States?
The circus Democratic Senators created surrounding the Kavanaugh nomination should serve as a scarlet letter on every single one of them for the rest of their lives and should stain the buildings they’ll fund in their states with our tax dollars with will bare their names. It’s a disgrace.
Accusations that would get laughed out of any court in the land before they got in the door are treated as if they were carved into stone tablets by a burning bush by these charlatans. And now the entrance of Creepy Porn Lawyer with bogus allegations of serial gang rape at parties in the early 80s where no one ever said a word, yet people still voluntarily attended. It’s so stupid it’s funny.
The worst of the worst, at least among those not employed by major newspapers or CNN and MSNBC, are Senators Mazie Hirono of Hawaii and Kirsten Gillibrand from New York. Each, on several occasions, have said things about Judge Kananaugh that would get them sued for their net worth and more if they’d said it about anyone not a public figure. …
The despicable charges leveled against Judge Kavanaugh since he performed so brilliantly throughout the Judiciary Committee hearings are so patently false that it would be amusing to watch the Democrats support and defend the accusers if this were not so deadly serious – for Brett Kavanaugh, for his family, and for the country. We know from Brian Fallon, a Hillary Clinton operative, that the left has planned to destroy any person Trump nominates to the Court. One has to wonder what the left’s strategy would be had he nominated Amy Coney Barrett. Perhaps leftists would have reported that she had worked her way through college as a stripper or a prostitute. One thing is certain: they would have pulled out every sleazy trick in their playbook to see that she was not confirmed, either.
This is who the Democrats are these days. They will go to any lengths, no matter how seedy or illegal or fabricated, to ruin the people they fear. Whom do they fear? Good, honest men like Brett Kavanaugh. People they cannot manipulate, bribe, or threaten to do their bidding.
Who represents Christine Blasey Ford? Debra Katz, a far-left socialist and HRC fundraiser whose firm once represented Julie Swetnick, the most recent and most ridiculous accuser. Swetnick is the one who, after she was in college, continued to attend high school parties where, she claims, boys drugged girls and then lined up to “train rape” them. She went to such parties at least ten times but told no one, reported nothing, even though she must have been the only adult present. That in itself pretty much proves that this planned and plotted smear is all part of an overall strategy to keep anyone Trump nominates from being confirmed.
None of these women is remotely believable. Their calculated accusations are purposefully vague, without any details that might lead to any corroboration or investigation. The next one, Deborah Ramirez, is even less valid. That woman had to be cajoled for six days to become “confident” enough to name Kavanaugh as the man who perhaps exposed himself to her when she was drop-dead drunk on the floor of a party house. She has wisely refused to testify to anyone. Who convinced her to speak up? The same bevy of Democrat and media operatives tasked for months to dig up dirt on the cleanest man in D.C. So whom did they get to accuse him of made up allegations? Most likely the most vulnerable, troubled women they could find. Who else but persons of questionable sanity would agree to levy such unverifiable charges against a man they clearly never knew? Sadly, there are many women who lie, women who seek unwarranted attention, women who are mentally ill and easily manipulated to the do the bidding of others with contemptible motives. The Democrats found these three or four, and now they using and abusing them.
The left today, which encompasses the entirety of the Democratic Party and the mainstream media, has no scruples, no ethics, no moral sense. Leftists’ defense of the Clintons’ criminality; Bill Clinton’s serial abuse of women; and Obama’s anti-constitutional, race-hustling activity throughout his eight-year tenure has rendered them corrupt and disreputable. If this circus of false accusations against Kavanaugh has demonstrated anything, it is the complete wickedness of the Democratic Party and the mainstream media.
There are really no words to adequately describe the rage the decent people of this nation feel toward today’s left. There will be no blue wave. Of that we can be sure. The Democrats in D.C. may think they are clever in mounting this monstrous smear, but liberals with families – sons and daughters – are hopefully not so easily led by scams. They will leave the Democratic Party in droves in disgust.
Trump is right. This is a Democrat “con game.” Chuck Schumer is likely behind this entire travesty along with an assembled group of financiers like the Clintons, Soros, and “resisters” like Katz. Someone is paying these women and their lawyers. That they have offered up stories that are so absurd and unprovable just certifies their conviction that the rest of us are really dumb, and they think they are cunning when they are merely conniving.
This is the usual Democrat error in judgment. This is why Democrats were so convinced that Hillary would win the 2016 election in a landslide. They have no idea of the contempt so many millions of us have for them and their tactics. What they have done to Kavanaugh is the final straw. Only hardcore radicals will support what they have done to this man. Self-respecting liberals, along with all conservatives, are horrified by the vicious character assassination of a man who has led an exemplary life. Liberals have smeared him relentlessly for politics, because they lost an election they felt entitled to win. Thanks to Trump, Americans may yet win.
This morning’s hearing has yet to take place, but it seems that at least one man has come forward to say he may have been the person for whom Christine Blasey Ford has mistaken Kavanaugh. If this turns out to be true, Kavanaugh and his legions of supporters will be vindicated.
The Democrats have viciously overplayed their hand
By Patricia McCarthy
This tragedy that became a farce is now a crime, the crime of purposeful defamation of an innocent man. The left is so determined to prevent Kavanaugh from becoming a justice on the Supreme Court, they have exposed themselves as the lowlife cheaters they are, without shame or any sense of decency.
When they do not win, they will do anything to undo their loss. This is what has motivated the left since the 2016 election. From the moment Trump won, they set about their plans to remove him from office by any means necessary. The cabal that put this plan into motion cares nothing for the law, the Constitution, or the people they set out to ruin as they have Brett Kavanaugh.
There are no words to adequately describe how venal these conspirators among the Congressional left are, how low they are prepared to go. And to this day, not one Democrat has spoken out against this monstrous plan to destroy a fine man who has led an impeccable life. Not one. Each and every one of them knows this is an odious campaign based on lies but not one of them will admit to this fact. The Democratic Party is officially deplorable in every sense of the word.
Blasey Ford’s allegations are laughable; not at all credible. The woman has no memory of when, where, how her alleged assault took place. She was and remains known for her excessive drinking. She has no idea who groped her any more than the second woman Ronan Farrow and Jane Mayer (who regularly celebrates the wrong people) have written about in the New Yorker knows who exposed himself to her, if anyone.
Like Blasey Ford, Debra Ramirez also could not find one person to corroborate her story. She tried for six days! Is someone is paying these women to prostitute themselves on the altar of lies in order to destroy Kavanaugh. Soros? Steyer? The Clintons? They are all infamous for funding and/or promoting this kind of fake news.
Can there be any Americans following this story who are not enraged and offended by the obvious orchestrated smear of a good and decent man? According to some polls, yes. Who are the people who believe these accusers? How could any American fall for such a scam? No mystery there. American educational standards have fallen so drastically that young people have no civic knowledge. They know nothing about American history or the Constitution.
This has been by design. The left has controlled how history is taught for at least three decades. They don’t even know that one must be presumed innocent until proven guilty. These Ford-supporting Senators don’t seem to remember this either. That in itself is stunning. The Democrats have assembled a mob and “The mob is the mother of tyrants.” (Diogenes)
As Blasey Ford’s story disintegrates, the Dems conveniently found the second woman willing to throw herself on the pyre of indecency in order to destroy a fine man and his family. The New Yorker, (of course) is on board with the rest of the left and happy to co-ordinate to take Kavanaugh down. But even the NYT refused to print Ramirez’s allegation. There are no facts in her story, no witnesses, not one. There is only her admitted foggy memory of an admitted drunken evening. She had no clear memory that it was Kavanaugh until coached and cajoled for six days by leftist activists.
Taking Trump out means humiliating anyone and everyone in his administration, his judicial nominees, and his supporters; no ethics, no morals, no scruples required. Trump is dealing with the Harry Reid/Chuck Schumer brand of politics: lethal, cruel, and barbaric.
And look who are the accusers’ cohorts: the 85-year-old Feinstein who is as corrupt as Hillary Clinton when it comes to using her Senate seat to enrich herself, Gillibrand who rants and raves her hypocrisy like a 12 year old. (She is pals with Harvey Weinstein and Bill Clinton.) Then there is the fatuous Senator Blumenthal, the stolen valor senator who falsely claimed he fought in Viet Nam. He insists it is Kavanaugh who must prove his innocence. Kamala Harris, well known to be ethically challenged is of course howling about the “victims.” Judge Kavanaugh is the victim here.
Senator Mazie Hirono of Hawaii is too ignorant of the Constitution and basic ethics to discuss; she is a disgrace to the Senate and her state. Men, to Hirono, should not have a voice because they are all guilty. She says the law does not apply here because “we are not in a court of law, we are in the court of credibility.” No evidence needed. She is a very stupid woman and Hawaiians actually elected her. This is a huge problem. It is disturbing that any of these people were elected. Voters need to be more cognizant about the character of the people for whom they vote.
It is too soon to predict how this horrific, criminal upheaval will end. Will the left succeed in destroying Kavanaugh? If they do, it will signal the end of our democratic republic as we know it. It will mean that the media and their fake polls govern us all, that Cloward and Piven have won, Marx has won and Saul Alinsky has won, and that Obama did indeed “fundamentally transform the nation.”
And it will mean the loss of the House and Senate in November. Republicans will be so furious at their representatives they will not vote. If Republicans in Congress are so spineless, why bother when they let the democrats run the show even when they are the majority party?
Clearly Kavanaugh is a fine and decent man. Those searching for troubled women to accuse him of some unverifiable crime are loathsome. What these democrats and their operatives in the media are doing to him is unconscionable. They know very well these allegations are lies. They helped invent them. The Republicans must not let them win. Confirm the man now.
Even before President Trump’s election, hatred had begun to emerge on the American left—counterintuitively, as an assertion of guilelessness and moral superiority. At the Women’s March in Washington the weekend after Mr. Trump’s inauguration, the pop star Madonna said, “I have thought an awful lot of blowing up the White House.” Here hatred was a vanity, a braggadocio meant to signal her innocence of the sort of evil that, in her mind, the White House represented. (She later said the comment was “taken wildly out of context.”)
For many on the left a hateful anti-Americanism has become a self-congratulatory lifestyle. “America was never that great,” New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo recently said. For radical groups like Black Lives Matter, hatred of America is a theme of identity, a display of racial pride.
For other leftists, hate is a license. Conservative speakers can be shouted down, even assaulted, on university campuses. Republican officials can be harassed in restaurants, in the street, in front of their homes. Certain leaders of the left—Rep. Maxine Waters comes to mind—are self-appointed practitioners of hate, urging their followers to think of hatred as power itself.
How did the American left—conceived to bring more compassion and justice to the world—become so given to hate? It began in the 1960s, when America finally accepted that slavery and segregation were profound moral failings. That acceptance changed America forever. It imposed a new moral imperative: America would have to show itself redeemed of these immoralities in order to stand as a legitimate democracy.
The genius of the left in the ’60s was simply to perceive the new moral imperative, and then to identify itself with it. Thus the labor of redeeming the nation from its immoral past would fall on the left. This is how the left put itself in charge of America’s moral legitimacy. The left, not the right—not conservatism—would set the terms of this legitimacy and deliver America from shame to decency.
This bestowed enormous political and cultural power on the American left, and led to the greatest array of government-sponsored social programs in history—at an expense, by some estimates, of more than $22 trillion. But for the left to wield this power, there had to be a great menace to fight against—a tenacious menace that kept America uncertain of its legitimacy, afraid for its good name.
This amounted to a formula for power: The greater the menace to the nation’s moral legitimacy, the more power redounded to the left. And the ’60s handed the left a laundry list of menaces to be defeated. If racism was necessarily at the top of the list, it was quickly followed by a litany of bigotries ending in “ism” and “phobia.”
The left had important achievements. It did rescue America from an unsustainable moral illegitimacy. It also established the great menace of racism as America’s most intolerable disgrace. But the left’s success has plunged it into its greatest crisis since the ’60s. The Achilles’ heel of the left has been its dependence on menace for power. Think of all the things it can ask for in the name of fighting menaces like “systemic racism” and “structural inequality.” But what happens when the evils that menace us begin to fade, and then keep fading?
It is undeniable that America has achieved since the ’60s one of the greatest moral evolutions ever. That is a profound problem for the left, whose existence is threatened by the diminishment of racial oppression. The left’s unspoken terror is that racism is no longer menacing enough to support its own power. The great crisis for the left today—the source of its angst and hatefulness—is its own encroaching obsolescence. Today the left looks to be slowly dying from lack of racial menace.
A single white-on-black shooting in Ferguson, Mo., four years ago resulted in a prolonged media blitz and the involvement of the president of the United States. In that same four-year period, thousands of black-on-black shootings took place in Chicago, hometown of the then-president, yet they inspired very little media coverage and no serious presidential commentary.
White-on-black shootings evoke America’s history of racism and so carry an iconic payload of menace. Black-on-black shootings carry no such payload, although they are truly menacing to the black community. They evoke only despair. And the left gets power from fighting white evil, not black despair.
Today’s left lacks worthy menaces to fight. It is driven to find a replacement for racism, some sweeping historical wrongdoing that morally empowers those who oppose it. (Climate change?) Failing this, only hatred is left.
Hatred is a transformative power. It can make the innocuous into the menacing. So it has become a weapon of choice. The left has used hate to transform President Trump into a symbol of the new racism, not a flawed president but a systemic evil. And he must be opposed as one opposes racism, with a scorched-earth absolutism.
For Martin Luther King Jr., hatred was not necessary as a means to power. The actual details of oppression were enough. Power came to him because he rejected hate as a method of resisting menace. He called on blacks not to be defined by what menaced them. Today, because menace provides moral empowerment, blacks and their ostensible allies indulge in it. The menace of black victimization becomes the unarguable truth of the black identity. And here we are again, forever victims.
Yet the left is still stalked by obsolescence. There is simply not enough menace to service its demands for power. The voices that speak for the left have never been less convincing. It is hard for people to see the menace that drives millionaire football players to kneel before the flag. And then there is the failure of virtually every program the left has ever espoused—welfare, public housing, school busing, affirmative action, diversity programs, and so on.
For the American left today, the indulgence in hate is a death rattle.
NEW. The Washington Post Sandbagged the Story That Might Have Cleared Brett Kavanaugh
Posted at 9:32 am on September 23, 2018 by streiff
Image by Don Hinchcliffe via Flickr Creative Commons https://www.flickr.com/photos/dionhinchcliffe/ License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.0/
Yesterday, there were two steps forward on the road to the confirmation of Brett Kavanaugh. The lawyers for Christine Ford, she’s the California woman who has accused Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh of groping her at a party 37 years ago, and the Senate Judiciary Committee agreed that Ford would testify on Thursday. This represents a walkback for Chuck Grassley and makes one queasey at what else he may give away in order to propitiate the angry, hairy goddesses of #MeToo. The second item was that another person Ford had named as a witness, Leland Ingham Keyser, provided a statement to the Senate Judiciary Committee. She said that a) she didn’t know Brett Kavanaugh and b) she was never at a party like the one described by Ford. If you are keeping score, this makes four people–Brett Kavanaugh, Mark Judge, Patrick Smyth, and Leland Keyser–who have denied this incident ever happened under penalty of perjury. The only person who has not made a statement under oath is…Christine Ford.
Now the Wall Street Journal’s Kimberly Strassel reports that the Washington Post knew of Keyser, they knew of her denial, and they refused to report it.
2) The email wants a comment from him. The subsequent story would reveal Christine Ford’s name, and give details of the supposed “assault.”
— Kimberley Strassel (@KimStrassel) September 23, 2018
4) This matters for two big reasons–Ford’s credibility and WaPo’s. The subsequent WaPo story would go on to cite Ford’s name and details, and also list notes from a therapist that Ford told this to in 2012. Read carefully what WaPo reports, the same day it emails Judge:
— Kimberley Strassel (@KimStrassel) September 23, 2018
6) Wait, say what? WaPo reports publicly that Ford says it was “four boys,”even after WaPo reporter tells Judge that Ford had told her it was three boys and a girl.
— Kimberley Strassel (@KimStrassel) September 23, 2018
8) Other problem: WaPo’s reporting. Reporter has for a week had the names of those Ford listed as present. One is a woman. Yet it writes a story saying FOUR BOYS. Why? Maybe a mistake. But if so, why did WaPo never correct that narrative?
— Kimberley Strassel (@KimStrassel) September 23, 2018
10) In its most recent update tonight, WaPo writes: “Before her name became public, Ford told The Post she did not think Keyser would remember the party because nothing remarkable had happened there, as far as Keyser was aware.”
— Kimberley Strassel (@KimStrassel) September 23, 2018
11) Wow. “Before her name became public, Ford told…” That is WaPo admitting that it had the name, and had Ford’s response to what would clearly be a Keyser denial, but NEVER PUT IT OUT THERE. Again, why? A lot of people have a lot questions to answer.
— Kimberley Strassel (@KimStrassel) September 23, 2018
There is exactly one reason why the Washington Post would not run this account, it was not damaging to Kavanaugh and it pointed to the rather obvious probability that Ford was a liar, a fabulist, or a few fries short of a Happy Meal.
More to the point, there is a great deal of reason to think that if this party had actually happened that Keyser would have remembered. Keyser and Ford have remained friends since high school. Here is a party where Ford vanished in the middle of the party, leaving Keyser alone in a house with three drunken teens who, according to Ford, had rape on their minds. One would think that she would at least have remembered that even if Ford had never told her why she suddenly ran off and left her alone and in danger.
Even with Ford’s caveat that Keyser might not remember anything, her statement was critical to our understanding of what happened. And her statement was, in regards to this party, the same as those of Judge and Smyth. So why were their stories important and Keyser’s not? Because the #MeToo harpies hate men and actually believe that a man’s denial is proof of his guilt.
Amazingly some conservative/ Republican sources are acting as though Christine Blasey Ford isn’t either delusional or lying through her teeth.
If the Democrats and the left had a history of being honest, believing that there might be a shred of truth in Blasey Ford’s statements would be understandable, but given the simple fact that Democrat politicians, left-wing commentators, and the entire fake news media do nothing but lie, it’s insane for anyone to treat Blasey Ford better than the Democrats are treating the woman who is accusing Keith Ellison.
We all know that Anita Hill was a liar because the fact that she followed Judge Clarence Thomas when he moved to a new job shows that she wasn’t that offended by anything he did. The Democrats have learned their lesson, so Christine Blasey Ford is someone who apparently only met Kavanaugh once and who doesn’t remember any details about the event that could be used to discredit her charge.
Anyone who thinks that the Democrats won’t produce a woman who will claim that whoever Trump nominates tried to rape them is clinically insane. And if Trump nominates a woman they’ll find some other fake charge, like she belongs to a “cult”, to smear her.
It’s time to call out publicly and repeatedly the massive lies of the Democrats and their propaganda arm, the fake news media. Republicans should take a lesson from Trump; don’t pretend that modern Democrat politicians are decent, honest men who disagree, rather call them out for being the racist liars that they are.
Democrats lie about caring about blacks. Democrats do nothing to end the slaughter of blacks in Democratic-run cities.
Democrats lie about global warming. The climate models are all wrong because data shows the earth warming 2.7 times slower than the rate that the climate models claim.
Democrats lie about Trump colluding with the Russians. They knew from the beginning that the Steele dossier was a bunch of unverified gossip from Russian sources.
Democrats lie about abortion. Science tells us that the unborn are human beings but Democrats lie about that all the time.
Democrats lie about the transgendered. Democrats just want to empower this insanity even though people who have sex-change surgery are much more likely to commit suicide than sane people.
Democrats lie about gays. Democrats tell us that the gay lifestyle is great and in the next breathe tell us that we must spend billions on curing AIDS.
Democrats lie about what Trump says. Trump condemns fake news media and the media says that he’s condemning the idea of a free press. Trump says that some illegals are criminals and the Democrats say he said all illegals are criminals.
Democrats lie about welfare. They continue to push the same old failing welfare programs long after it’s clear they’ve failed.
Democrats lie about caring about women. All of the monsters who have been outed by the #MeToo movement have been Democrats.
It’s time for every Republican to declare that it’s a sad day that we can’t trust a woman who claiming to have been assaulted because of the nonstop lying by Democrats on every issue under the sun. We need to shout from the rooftops that the clearly political staging of Blasey Ford’s claim undermines the public’s trust in women who were in fact assaulted and as such Democrats are working hard to undermine women.
We will not win if we continue to act as though modern Democrats and their fake news media propaganda are good people. Because if we don’t stand up and shout out the truth the average American won’t realize the mendacity of the Democrat politicians.
Ford vs. Kavanaugh: There’s Nothing to Investigate
By Tom Trinko
The fact that Christine Blasey Ford is refusing to testify before Congress makes it clear that even she doesn’t think she’s credible.
But wait, you say: she’s willing to testify after an FBI investigation.
The problem with that is that there is nothing to investigate. Christine Blasey Ford’s claims don’t involve rape; that’s just her opinion of what was going on. She wasn’t even undressed; her clothes weren’t ripped; and once she got off the bed, the alleged rapist just let her walk away and eventually leave the house without any further problem. That’s the worst-case scenario, assuming she’s not lying. That sure sounds more like a drunk kid clumsily hitting on a girl who he thought was interested than a kid intent on raping a girl. It’s bad, to be sure, but it’s not “destroy a person’s life decades later” bad.
Forget that for a moment. Let’s assume that everything she’s said is true. What could the FBI investigate?
The bureau would have to find every house in the area where there had been a party for teens over a period of several years and see if anyone remembered anything. Remember: not only doesn’t Christine Blasey Ford remember the house that this amazingly traumatic event occurred in, but she’s not even sure what year it was.
But what could any of those people remember? If Christine Blasey Ford isn’t lying, there are only three possible witnesses: herself, Kavanaugh, and Judge. According to Christine Blasey Ford’s account, whoever else – the number seems to be changing with time – was in the house would have no way of knowing if something had happened, since the stereo was too loud for anyone not in the room to hear her screams.
What Christine Blasey Ford is asking for is for the FBI to spend literally years tracking down every party anyone at Kavanaugh’s or her high school went to over a span of several years decades ago. Then, having found nothing more than what we already know today – there are only three people who can be witnesses, according to Christine Blasey Ford, and we already know who they are – then and only then might Christine Blasey Ford be willing to testify.
Every sane person realizes that decades after an event such as what Christine Blasey Ford describes, the only evidence is the witnesses’ testimony. We can’t do a rape kit when there was no rape. We can’t check for DNA when there was no sex. We can’t check phone records when there were no cell phones.
Whether it’s now or after an FBI investigation, it all boils down to the witnesses identified by Christine Blasey Ford. Kavanaugh has never been accused of such behavior before in his life and says it didn’t happen. Judge says it didn’t happen. And Christine Blasey Ford didn’t even mention it to anyone for decades. When she did mention it, her claim was contradicted by the notes her therapist took. Which is more likely: he didn’t understand what she was saying, or she desperately needs to change her story to attack Kavanaugh?
What Christine Blasey Ford and her Democrat enablers are asking is that we should allow her charges to go forward without her actually having to expose herself to perjury charges until after a years-long FBI investigation.
The FBI looked at her claim and said there was nothing to investigate. Either the Democrats have to say the FBI is incompetent, which will really undermine their war on Trump, or they have to accept that there is nothing to investigate.
It’s clear that the Democrats are just trying to delay the vote so they can keep the Court as a tool to make up the laws that Democrats can’t get passed through the democratic process.
It’s time to end this farce. In every valid #MeToo case, the perpetrators harassed several women, and they harassed in the present, not just decades ago. All the Democrats have is one politically active leftist woman who can’t even remember where the alleged assault occurred. She has a lot of incentive to lie and, until she is forced to testify under oath, no reason to tell the truth if it doesn’t support her attack on Kavanaugh.
For those people who say we must believe the “victim,” we can only point to the many cases where women have lied about being assaulted. Take the stripper in the Duke Lacrosse case, the college student in the Rolling Stone story, and Nikki Yovino. While leftists think we should just presume that every non-leftist man is guilty based on the uncorroborated claims of one woman, that’s not how justice works. Women aren’t always honest, and men aren’t always rapists.
Everything about Christine Blasey Ford’s actions – wanting to be able to accuse Kavanaugh anonymously, refusing to testify, not remembering the facts necessary to check her claims, waiting until after the last minute to come forward – is fundamentally different from the other #MeToo cases we’ve seen. Further, Kavanaugh is completely different from the perpetrators in other #MeToo cases. Women say he’s a gentleman. No other accusations have surfaced since he was in high school. There is no pattern of harassment – only the word of one politically active woman who hates his adherence to the Constitution.
Ignoring for the moment the double standard that let Ted Kennedy to murder a woman and stay in politics but demands that Kavanaugh be cast into darkness based on the uncorroborated, denied, and full of problems claims of one woman, if Kavanaugh isn’t appointed because of this, no conservative will ever be appointed again, because there will always be a leftist woman willing to lie so that she can make sure Americans can keep killing their unborn babies.
September 19, 2018 No way any conservative should stay home in November
By Silvio Canto, Jr.
Once in a while, we hear some on our side say voting does not matter. Why vote Republican? they say. What difference does it make?
Over the last two weeks, we saw in the U.S. Senate “exhibit A” of why the Democrats cannot be allowed to take over the Congress. Also, we watch Miss Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez fumble and gibber while trying to explain how we are going to pay for universal health care.
Why vote Republican? The answer is that the Democrats are out of their minds, to put it politely.
This is our “ghost of the future” moment.
I agree with Investor’s Business Daily:
Democrats are warning conservatives, and those who would appoint them, that they will do anything to derail their nominations. That includes flagrant attempts at character assassination – even if that requires throwing out unverifiable allegations from the distant past at the 11th hour.
At this point, the only real question that needs an answer is whether Republicans will reward Democrats for their craven attempts to scare highly qualified conservatives away from public service.
We had a view of the future last week, and it includes Senator Cory Booker, Senator Kamala Harris, screamers yelling obscenities, and other forms of total madness.
Not totally happy with the GOP? I am not thrilled, either, but it is only thing standing between sanity and what we are watching in the U.S. Senate.