Hispanic Unemployment

Hispanic Unemployment Rate Hits Record Low in December

By Craig Bannister | January 4, 2019 | 8:43 AM EST

The national seasonally-adjusted unemployment rate for Hispanics and Latinos in the U.S. labor force hit its lowest level on record in December of 2018, U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) data released Friday show.

In December, the unemployment rate for Hispanics and Latinos, aged 16 and up, was 4.4%, down from 4.5% in November – tying its record low of 4.4% set in October of this year. BLS began tracking Hispanic-Latino employment data in 1973.

(Screenshot)

The number of Hispanics employed set a new record high of 27,701,000 in December, even as their unemployment fell to a record low. The number of Hispanics employed, participating in the workplace, and civilian population all rose in December, as Hispanics’ labor force participation rate increased from 66.8% to 67.0%, recording its fourth straight monthly increase.

Hispanic-Latino employment statistics for November 2018:

· Unemployment rate: 4.4%, down from 4.5% in November

· Civilian Noninstitutionalized Population (16+ years old): 43,234,000 up from 43,146,000 in November

· Number Participating in Labor Force: 29,963,000, up from 28,820,000 in November

· Labor Force Participation: 67.0%, up from 66.8% in November

· Number Employed: 27,701,000, up from 27,524,000 in November

· Number Unemployed: 1,261,000, down from 1,296,000 in November

Number of Hispanics Employed (Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics)

Via:

Posted in Politics | Tagged | Leave a comment

Remember Obama on jobs

Posted in Politics | Tagged , | 1 Comment

Jobs

US economy added 312,000 jobs in December, blowing past expectations

Megan Henney

U.S. employers added 312,000 jobs in December, blowing past Wall Street’s expectations for an increase of 177,000 jobs, even on the heels of a tumultuous month for the markets that saw the Dow Jones Industrial Average and S&P 500 post their worst performance since the Great Depression.

The unemployment rate rose to 3.9 percent, while the labor force participation rate also rose slightly to 63.1 percent from 62.9 percent during the month. Average hourly earnings meanwhile rose by 11 cents to $27.48. Over the year, average hourly earnings have increased by a total of 84 cents, or about 3.2 percent.

Although experts categorized the gains as unsustainable, they also said it meant an economic recession may not occur as soon as once believed.

“The U.S. economy will eventually fall into recession, maybe as soon as next year, but the December employment report indicates that this isn’t going to happen anytime soon,” said David Berson, the chief economist at Nationwide.

Jobs numbers come on the heels of a report Thursday from payroll processing firm ADP, which revealed the private sector added 271,000 jobs in December, soaring past analysts’ expectations of 178,000 jobs.

Via:

Posted in Politics | Tagged | 1 Comment

Former New York Times editor

Posted in Politics | Tagged | Leave a comment

Popular Weather App

Popular Weather App Collects Too Much User Data, Security Experts Say

China-based app asked for more data than the usual location request, including email addresses

An office worker in Cajamar, Brazil. A popular weather app for Android asks users for much more than their location and tried to subscribe some Alcatel smartphone users in Brazil to paid virtual-reality services.
An office worker in Cajamar, Brazil. A popular weather app for Android asks users for much more than their location and tried to subscribe some Alcatel smartphone users in Brazil to paid virtual-reality services. Photo: Dado Galdieri/Bloomberg News

NEW DELHI—A popular weather app built by a Chinese tech conglomerate has been collecting an unusual amount of data from smartphones around the world and attempting to subscribe some users to paid services without permission, according to a London-based security firm’s research.

The free app, one of the world’s most-downloaded weather apps in Google’s Play store, is from TCL Communication Technology Holdings Ltd., of Shenzhen, China. TCL makes Alcatel- and BlackBerry -branded phones, while a sister company makes televisions. …

Full Story:

Posted in Lifestyle | Tagged | Leave a comment

Lowest number of regulations

Trump administration sets record for lowest number of regulations

By Rick Moran
—————————-

An undeniable success of the Trump administration has been a radical altering of the mindset of federal agencies when it comes to creating new regulations.  Trump’s executive order at the beginning of his term that stated for every one regulation created, two must be repealed has worked like a charm.

The Competitive Enterprise Institute issued its year-end report, which says that over the last two years, the fewest regulations in history have been created.

Washington Examiner:

“At year-end 2018, how is President Donald Trump’s regulatory reform project going?  Better than Obama, Bush II, and Clinton in terms of fewer regulations; but not as good as Trump’s own first year,” said the Competitive Enterprise Institute.

CEI regulations guru Clyde Wayne Crews Jr. said in a year-end report provided in advance to Secrets that Trump ended the year with 3,367 new regulations.  That is the lowest since records were first kept in the 1970s.

But Crews noted that Trump’s number of new regulations is lower.  The reason: the government requires a “regulation” to kill a regulation, and Trump is continuing on his promise to kill two regulations for every new one he proposes.

“Obama’s own lowest count was 3,410, not much more than Trump’s new score.  But fewer of Obama’s rules would be expected to have been devoted to rollbacks of prior initiatives, the emphasis of Trump’s ‘one-in, two-out’ executive order,” said Crews, CEI’s vice president for policy.

“The Federal Register closed out 2018 with 3,367 final rules in all.  The only lower count was 3,281 under Trump a year ago, which was the lowest count since records began being kept in the mid-1970s,” he added.

Federal Register pages are also way down, winning praise from corporate America and consumers.

Under Trump the daily list of pages totaled 61,308 in 2017 and 68,082 this year.

More good news: Under Trump, the ratio of laws passed by Congress to regulations created is way down.

In what Crews has dubbed the “Unconstitutionality Index,” Trump has has [sic] also slashed the percentage of new rules to new laws passed by Congress and signed by Trump, he wrote in a second report issued Monday.

Trump’s 2018 index was 12: 3,367 new rules compared to 291 new laws.

The Index reached 29 under Obama.

What do you suppose would happen if we have six more years of regulatory rollbacks?  The government would still be oppressive, but a lot less so.  At the very least, the perception of government getting off the backs of business would keep the confidence level high among most industries.

Via:

Posted in Politics | Tagged | Leave a comment

Ballot-harvesting

DREAMers tell of going ballot-harvesting in California to flip the House blue

By Monica Showalter
———————————-

It was one of those tug-on-the-heartstrings, tear-jerking, carefully curated narratives about DREAMers we’re supposed to read and respond to with sympathy.

But a story that ran in the Los Angeles Times yesterday accidentally did more to raise questions about the issue of ballot-harvesting in California than any raving right-wing tome could ever do.

The Times describes how California’s famed ballot-harvesters, who flipped places such as Orange County blue by “helping” fill out, turn in, and continue to turn in ballots from otherwise uncommitted voters until they got the result they wanted, aren’t actually U.S. citizens.  Here are the DREAMers in action, “helping” the voters to vote the way they wanted:

In California, Dreamers like Cruz phoned voters, walked precincts and protested outside Republican lawmakers’ offices, reaching people who had not been called or visited by either party. Their efforts helped boost turnout among Latinos in this year’s midterm election – 29 million nationwide were eligible to vote, according to the Pew Research Center – which is projected to surpass levels higher than in past presidential election years, political analysts said.

An analysis of data from eight states by the Latino Policy and Politics Initiative at UCLA found the Latino vote grew by an estimated 96% from 2014 to 2018, compared with 37% among non-Latinos.  The surge, researchers said, helped move 20 House districts held by Republicans to Democratic control in California, Arizona, Nevada, Texas, New Mexico, Florida, New Jersey and New York.

Here’s how they actually did it:

Half an hour later, she was helping Silva look up candidates as he filled out his ballot by the light of her phone.  “I’m glad you guys came,” he said.  “I was going to leave it in my drawer.”

The story doesn’t say what the DREAMer/ballot-harvester would do if the voter decided to vote some other way from the way she wanted him to fill his ballot out.  The incurious reporter omitted the obvious question from that heart-tugging scene: Did this foreigner tell the indifferent man how to fill out his ballot?  Let’s just say the reporter showed a strong interest, based on the rest of her reportage, in protecting the foreigner from any accusation of illegal voting.

But only a fool would think she didn’t tell the indifferent man whom to vote for, effectively voting by proxy.

This pretty well amounts to foreign nationals voting, without any fear of prosecution.  That changes the nature of the election and, in fact, the U.S. republic itself.  Voting up until now has been a practice reserved for citizens.  Today, non-citizens vote – by getting hold of indifferent Americans and in a perfectly legal setup in California, filling in the ballots by proxy, with no fingerprints visible.  Who knows what kind of coercion may be employed by some of them?  

And even more disturbingly, if DREAMers can do that to promote their own political agenda, what’s to stop other foreigners, with far more malign agendas, from doing it?  Shall a team of Russian or Chinese agents, Arab terrorists, or Mexican cartels, be next to help harvest the ballots?  (You know the Chinese are thinking about it.)  They’re as foreign as DREAMers, and it would be perfectly legal under current California law.  Ballot-harvesting, which is illegal in most states, makes this all possible.  What’s to stop the Chinese from running an agent (as recent CIA busts show, it doesn’t need to be a Chinese-American) and then sending their goons and agents to the houses of Chinese-American voters in Chinese-American neighborhoods, to insist that they vote for Beijing’s candidate? They’d have the additional pull of being able to warn those voters about repercussions against family back home and don’t think they wouldn’t dream of using it.

What it means now is that the House has been flipped in no small part by foreigners, who not only cast one ballot, but may have cast dozens and dozens of ballots, all from the advantages of ballot-harvesting.

It sounds as though it’s time for a constitutional amendment to end this fiasco should the GOP retake the House in 2020, or we can forget about the integrity of the ballot entirely.  Spread the news of this de facto foreign voting far and wide.

Via:

Posted in Politics | Tagged | Leave a comment

Do Something!

Posted in Politics, Video | Tagged | Leave a comment

Liberal Privilege

The Only Privilege in America is Liberal Privilege

By Christopher Chantrill
———————————————–

As lefty online dictionaries  showcasing their lefty words of the year to review 2018 — such as the “toxic” in toxic masculinity, toxic culture, and toxic environment — I redeclare the following from 2015, without fear of contradiction:

The only privilege in America is Liberal Privilege.

Item: Michelle Alexander of the New York Times. Reported by Christopher DeGroot, she writes that none of us deserve to be Americans by the privilege of “birthright” citizenship. Okay, Ms. Privileged Times Writer, then prove your bona fides by giving up your privileged job to an educated migrant.

Item: AntiFa protesters in Portland and San Francisco, reported by Kevin Williamson. There is no greater privilege than for police to stand by and fail to enforce the law while the little darlings of the ruling class destroy the property of innocent citizens that are not licensed and bonded little darlings or the ruling class. Hey, AntiFa, why not try your mostly peaceful protesting where the police actually enforce the law — even, Gaia forbid, on mostly peaceful lefty protesters.

Item: An anti-Semitic lefty group tweeting to kick a Jewish cafe owner out of San Francisco for supporting Israel. Anyone an inch right of center-left would be kicked off Twitter for that. Hey Jack, how about cracking down on those lefty haters?

Item: Catherine Blasey Ford’s cock-and-bull story about being assaulted by Brett Kavanaugh nearly half a century ago when they were both teenagers. Do not try this tactic if you are a conservative woman attacking a liberal Supreme Court nominee.

And so on.

I’m in India right now, and back in the day, the Mughal emperors had audience halls, divans, at which they heard the petitions of the people. I don’t expect that these demi-gods believed too much in the notion of justice for the people, but they knew enough to keep the natives from getting restless. They at least pretended to care.

But here we are in America 2018, and if there is one thing we know these days is that the left doesn’t believe in justice for people like you and me. That’s what all the rubbish about toxic masculinity and white privilege is all about. Justice is only a thing for the ruling class and its little darlings. That is the point of left-wing politics ever since Marx. There are the good guys, the activists and intellectuals, dedicated to the holy work of bending the arc of history towards justice; there are the necessary victims for whom the activists selflessly advocate and mostly peacefully protest. And then there are the bad guys, starting with the bourgeoisie, followed by the racists, then the sexists, the homophobes, and now the transphobes, the white supremacists, and the toxic fill-in-the-blanks. But don’t entertain for one moment that you deplorables have the right to appear in the audience hall of your liberal lord and expect anything approaching a redress of grievances. You will notice that the rulers’ governing philosophy precludes this possibility, because they have already convicted you of toxic masculinity, white supremacy, or whatever the current activists have decided upon as the social crime du jour.

So here we have the kings and lords of old, who apparently felt that part of the art of ruling was to give their subjects the idea that their liege lord cared about hearing their grievances and even delivering equal justice under the law.

And we have our modern progressives, who do not believe that the people they have branded as toxic or as supremacist have a right to a hearing or to justice. That is because their politics has already determined who has a right to be heard and who has already been heard from too often. Simply put, activists and victims have a right to be heard, and a right to the redress if grievances; everything else is negotiable.

My line is that this attitude misunderstands the nature of justice and the nature of government. You can see it playing out in the yellow vest riots in France. The French ruling class had decided to fight climate change and was monstrously offended when the French people objected. Now, much too late, President Macron realizes he has a problem. Maybe if the president had held regular audiences — as kings did in olden times — at which ordinary people could air their grievances, he would not have been blindsided.

When you think about it, it is obvious that left-wing politics is fake politics. Instead of allowing the grievances of the people to develop organically, our modern elite creates an artificial politics with its activists — who do not represent the people but are instead the bribed apologists of the ruling class pretending to be the voice of the people. That’s why I say:

The only privilege in America is Liberal Privilege.

Via:

Posted in Politics | Tagged | Leave a comment

Happy New Year

Posted in Lifestyle | Tagged | Leave a comment

California Democrats

Calf. Democrats Who Moan About Deaths of Illegals Never Mentioned Death of Local Police Officer


650 Views

The same California politicians who repeatedly attack America for the death of two illegal alien kids have not said a word about the death of legal immigrant and California police officer, Corporal Ronil Singh.

Singh was murdered by an illegal alien who is also a dangerous gang member, but nearly every Democrat member of California’s congressional delegation ignored the murder of one of their state’s own police officers.

Corporal Ronil Singh was murdered by an illegal alien criminal on the day after Christmas, but three days later, nearly none of the state’s Democrats had bothered to say a word about the murder. …

Full Story:

Posted in Crime, Politics | Tagged | Leave a comment

Washington Post’s lefty journalists

Can the Washington Post’s lefty journalists give these points of bias a whirl?

By Jack Hellner
————————————

The close of 2018 has left us with quite a year in terms of media bias.  There are a lot of biased presses out there, not to mention television networks, but the Washington Post is one that stands out.  So here are some random thoughts I’ve put together for Washington Post reporters, columnists, and other opinionators to think about – and the rest of us, too.

It looks as though the stock market is going to rise over 1,000 points over the last four days of the year.  Could it be because the market is happy that President Trump is standing his ground on issues from the border wall to trade with China?  Or maybe the WaPo writers and other journalists should start to recognize that traders trade stocks up and down for myriad reasons, sometimes ones we don’t know.  Maybe they can look at that instead of constantly blaming Trump.

I saw on ABC News last night that Trump hadn’t talked with Senate minority leader Charles Schumer or House minority leader Nancy Pelosi for nineteen days.  The press essentially blamed Trump, as always.  Not once did these Democrat talking puppets of the press mention that Pelosi had been playing in a luxury resort in Hawaii, and that could be the problem.  The media narrative is never to blame Democrats.

I also would like to ask all Democrats why zoos use fourth-century technology, such as fences and walls, to keep dangerous animals in and the public out.  Why don’t they just use modern technology?

Is it possible that the reason why the U.S economy is growing so much faster than that of other countries is better policies?  Or is it just blind luck and magic?

Health care costs are stabilizing in 2019 after years of significant rises.  Could that be because health insurance companies no longer have a captive audience and consumers have more choices?  Or is it blind luck?

President Obama and others have said manufacturing jobs were gone for good.  Obama said it would take magic to bring them back.  Obviously, the magic consists of fewer regulations, lower taxes, more energy production, and leveling the playing field on trade.  When a president and his party believe that keeping manufacturing jobs requires magic, it is no wonder that we had the slowest economic recovery in seventy years.  Now we have Trump.

There are frequent articles saying Trump won’t win by pleasing just his base, which is probably true, but where are the stories that Democrats can’t win by pleasing just their base?  The base of socialists isn’t big enough to win.  I am sure that leading Democrats, such as Elizabeth Warren, will try to expand their voter base to include those who believe in smaller government, which, according to polls, amounts to the majority of the American people.

Do Democrats understand that a significant reason for energy prices being so reasonable right now is record production?  That’s helping the purchasing power of the poor and middle class, and nothing is being reported.  Do they understand that Democrat policies to stop energy production and block pipelines harm the poor and middle class while helping tyrants in Russia, Saudi Arabia, Iran, and elsewhere, whom Democrats pretend to be tough on?

Journalists must know the truth that previous across-the-board tax cuts have helped revive the economy and made tax revenues grow, not shrink.  So why does the Washington Post continue to report the lie that tax cuts shrink revenue?

It is factual that the climate has always changed cyclically and naturally and that temperatures have risen and fallen for significant periods of time without a direct correlation to CO2.  So why do journalists choose not to report the truth?  Does anyone actually believe that politicians and bureaucrats who can’t balance the budget, who refuse to spend $5 billion to secure the border, and who choose to lie continuously by saying we could keep our doctor, that we could keep our plan, that our premiums would go down and the budget deficit would go down can control temperatures, sea levels, and storm activity forever if we just hand over trillions of dollars to them?  If anyone believes these known liars, he should have his head examined and go snipe-hunting instead.  Success is much more likely.

Democrats gladly require photo IDs for many things that we need in our daily lives, yet they choose to lie that photo IDs as a requirement to vote oppress people.  I believe we all know why they lie and block those laws.

How many deaths of migrant children, based on dangerous caravans and human-smuggling operations, and how many deaths of innocents and cops at the hands of illegal aliens, must occur before Democrats will choose to follow the laws that Congress has already passed?  How many deaths before Democrats will secure the border and before journalists will place the blame for the deaths where it actually belongs instead of ginning up racial hate by calling President Trump and others who oppose open borders “xenophobes”?  Would we get President Trump’s border wall if an illegal alien attacked or killed a Washington Post journalist?

There is absolutely nothing progressive about a party that continually moves toward greater government power and continually reduces the freedom and power of the people.  They should be called the regressive or oppressive party, as they want to remake America to move it backward and to make more people dependent on government.  Tyranny happens when government becomes too powerful.

Happy New Year to all, and I hope all journalists resolve to stop using Democrat talking points as a major component of what they report.  If they don’t, they should register as lobbyists for the Democratic Party and report all their in-kind campaign contributions.

Via:

Posted in Politics | Tagged | Leave a comment

The coming Democratic implosion

The coming Democratic implosion

By Silvio Canto, Jr.
————————————

The Cowboys won’t play in the 2019 Super Bowl.  The Rangers are not quite ready for another postseason run.

Nevertheless, here is a prediction I am very confident about.

Someone said that Doug Schoen, former Clinton adviser and Fox News contributor, told Nancy Pelosi to rein in Congresswoman-Elect Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez.  Isn’t that like telling LeBron James to shut up and play basketball?  How do you stop AOC from talking when every news outlet wants to invite her to the show?

The complete and total implosion of the Democrats, especially the majority in the House, will be the story of 2019.  It may not be covered that way by CNN and MSNBC, but the towers will start falling soon.

We already see cracks in the so-called “Women’s March,” a phony parade that should have been called “the march of the anti-Trump women.”

We hear this:

Organizers of a Women’s March rally slated for Northern California next month have canceled the event, saying they were concerned that participants would have been “overwhelmingly white.”

In a news release, organizers for the march in Eureka – about 270 miles north of San Francisco – said Friday the “decision was made after many conversations between local social-change organizers and supporters of the march.”

“Up to this point, the participants have been overwhelmingly white, lacking representation from several perspectives in our community,” the news release continued.

Too white?

Is that crazy or what?  Isn’t the country 72% white?  Or at least it was the last time I checked the population figures.

We will see the implosion over two issues: health care and the mad impulse to get Trump.

On health care, the Democrats are deeply divided between the socialized medicine crowd and a realistic wing that knows we don’t have the money to do it.  Many of this “realist wing” were elected in competitive districts and have a tough re-election waiting for them in 2020.

On “getting Trump,” they will find that impeachment is about “high crimes and misdemeanors,” not defeating Hillary Clinton or appointing conservative judges.

By the fall of 2019, the cracks will be evident on those two issues and a few others.

The good news is that all of this craziness will convince Michael Bloomberg to run as an independent, and that will re-elect President Trump in a three-way race.  Bloomberg will be the Teddy Roosevelt of 1912 or Ross Perot of 1992, and President Trump will win 400 electoral votes.

So there is one prediction for 2019.

Via:

Posted in Politics | Tagged | Leave a comment

With no evidence

Democrats say, with no evidence, that walls don’t work

By Jack Hellner
—————————————–

Frequently when President Trump says something, the media follow his statements with three words: “with no evidence.” For example: He says there are criminals and terrorists in the caravan and they say that he has no evidence, even though there is plenty of evidence from government agencies.

Yet when Democrats frequently say walls don’t work, I never see the words “with no evidence” following the statement.  It appears to me that journalists never seek examples and when they know that barriers do work.

Tennessee State Prison wall (Photo credit: Alison Groves)

For Example:

  • Prisons have walls to keep criminals in and unwanted people out.
  • Lawmakers make laws to require fences around pools (on penalty of civil liability)  to make them safe. Why would they do that if barriers don’t work?
  • Forts have walls and gates.
  • Gated communities have barriers to keep unwanted people out. Many of the rich who have barriers protecting their homes pretend they are welcoming to all.
  • The White House has a fence.
  • Movie studios have gates and security to prevent unwanted people from coming in for secrecy and safety yet many Hollywood elite want open borders.
  • Castles had moats and walls.
  • Israel has a barrier that works.
  • The Vatican has a wall.

If walls don’t work, why did the Berlin Wall have to come down to give people access and freedom?

Nancy Pelosi says it is immoral to have the wall as if she is an expert on morality. Jerusalem had a wall during Jesus time.

THE WALLS OF JERUSALEM IN JESUS’ DAY—76 BC – AD 33

The walls in Jesus’s day were the same walls the Hasmoneans expanded. I drew a cross in the timeline at the location of Jesus’ crucifixion.

The modern Citadel marks the western limit of Jerusalem in the time of Jesus. Pontius Pilate’s Praetorium was in this spot, and from here he likely tried and condemned Jesus.

It is truly a shame that so many politicians, mostly Democrats, have given people from other countries the idea that they were entitled to come across our border illegally and so have endangered their children. That is immoral.

Pelosi seems to care more about allowing illegal aliens to come in than she does about the safety and welfare of U.S citizens. That is immoral.

It is immoral for politicians to take an oath to enforce the laws of the land and then create sanctuary cities and states to ignore the laws. How many people must die at the hands of illegals before Democrats give a damn? Where is the empathy and morality?

Nancy Pelosi is from California and the California Constitution requires state politicians (Pelosi is a federal office holder, but still….) to protect the safety of its people, so where do the Democrats get the idea they should allow illegal aliens to roam freely when many are obviously criminals?

Although it is not generally known — even to specialists in personal injury litigation — we all have a constitutional right to safety.  This right is not buried in some obscure constitutional amendment; it is found in Article I, Section 1 of the California Constitution.  This section of the State Constitution declares:

All people are by nature free and independent and have inalienable rights.  Among these are enjoying and defending life and liberty, acquiring, possessing, and protecting property, and pursuing and obtaining safety, happiness, and privacy.

Nancy Pelosi, Chuck Schumer and most of the media are pretending that, somehow, she has all the power here even though she only has the House.  While Trump has been attempting to negotiate. Pelosi and other Democrats have been resting.  Pelosi has been playing at a luxury resort in Hawaii. How would the media react if Trump was playing in Florida while Democrats were trying to negotiate?

Pelosi will come back and pass a bill with no money for a border barrier. She will dictate to her slaves to pass it and not care what is in it. Then it will go to the Senate where I hope hope that it will die.

When the complaining federal workers and journalists come to their senses, they should openly lobby Pelosi and the Democrats to vote for a barrier, as they have before, so government can reopen. All they have to do is use Senator Obama’s words from 2006 as a reason to vote for the money.

The American people are a welcoming and generous people. But those who enter our country illegally, and those who employ them, disrespect the rule of law. And because we live in an age where terrorists are challenging our borders, we simply cannot allow people to pour into the United States undetected, undocumented, and unchecked. Americans are right to demand better border security and better enforcement of the immigration laws. 

The media are actually the main reason that 25% of the Federal government is closed today, because they almost universally support Democrats whatever position they take and no matter how often they are hypocritical. How many people must die at the hands of illegal aliens before journalists care? How many families will lose children making a hazardous border crossing because they have been given the idea that the can enter America at will if they bring a child with them?

We let in over one million immigrants legally each year. It is fraudulent reporting to call Trump and other Republicans. They are called xenophobes for one reason only: to gin up racial hate to get votes for Democrats.

Via:

Posted in Crime, Politics | Tagged | Leave a comment

Bongino Blasts U.S. Immigration Policy

Posted in Politics, Video | Tagged | Leave a comment