- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
November 26, 2019
Blacks and Hispanics flee from Democrats on impeachment
Black and Hispanic voters are not onboard with the Democrat impeachment train.
According to Breitbart News, support for this all-white Democrat hobbyhorse project has collapsed:
A recent national poll released by Emerson College indicates that black Americans, a key constituency of the Democrat Party, narrowly opposes Trump’s impeachment. The poll found that 38 percent of black voters are opposed, while 37 percent are in favor, with 25 percent unsure.
Hispanic voters, meanwhile, were only narrowly in favor of impeachment, 48 percent to 41 percent, with 11 percent unsure. The Emerson poll also found 48 percent of white voters nationally were opposed to impeaching Trump, while 44 percent were supportive.
The results are starkly different from those recorded nationally by Emerson in October. At the time, 58 percent of black voters were in favor of impeaching Trump compared to only 27 percent against and 15 percent unsure. Likewise, 73 percent of Hispanics favored the president’s impeachment in October, while 24 percent were opposed and only 3 percent.
Overall, between the two surveys, support for impeaching Trump dropped 20 percent among black voters and 25 percent with Hispanics.
This makes perfect sense. Black and Hispanic voters have been courted assiduously by the Trump administration on things that really matter to them. President Trump has addressed the long-festering problems of the blue cities, such as disproportionate sentencings of petty criminals by solidly Democrat judges and prosecutors (I’m thinking of you, Kamala), and the dilapidated state of America’s one-party blue cities, along with the high housing costs that have driven many black voters into the hinterlands, where they are then abused for their fossil fuel use simply to get to their jobs. Trump has stood up for charter schools, and cripes, just good schools, which Democrat blue cities in the sway of teacher unions absolutely refuse to deliver.
More positively, Trump has stood up for jobs. His effort to institute some kind of border has resulted in higher wages for those just trying to get a leg on the first rung of the economic ladder as lower-cost workers from abroad can no longer drive down wages, and better still, deregulation and tax cuts have improved the business climate, meaning jobs for all, including choices of jobs. Black unemployment has now hit a 50-year low, and comparable figures are out there for Hispanics.
Given a choice of blue-city sameness, along with jail-happy characters like Kamala Harris populating the Democratic presidential field as a supposed sop to black voters — and a guy who hands people actual jobs in numbers like they’ve never seen and extends mercy to over-punished black prisoners — whom would you want to vote for? Black and Hispanic voters are not stupid. Why would they want the ante-Trump status quo compared to the opportunities now seen with Trump at the helm? Two polls yesterday show that black approval for President Trump has soared to 34%, an unprecedented number for any Republican, and interesting because it coincides with black voter dislike of white Democrat candidates, such as blue-city mayor Pete Buttigieg. Only Joe Biden, with his links to President Obama, seems to escape this, and frankly, that remains to be seen.
Not surprisingly, the collapse of support for impeachment among blacks and Hispanics coincides with a trend we saw yesterday — the sharp rise in black support for President Trump, something that has to stun Democrats and must give House Speaker Nancy Pelosi nightmares. It shows that the black voter dislike of Buttigieg is not at all about color; it’s about blue-city same-olds, in stark contrast to Trump’s helpfulness.
Now Democrats have put all their eggs in the impeachment basket, and not surprisingly, it’s an all-white show, with black representatives generally shut out from the important parts. The power rests in an all-white cast of players such as Reps. Adam Schiff, Eric Swalwell, and Jerry Nadler, who represent prosperous and suburban areas. Rep. Maxine Waters is black, and vocally in favor of impeachment, too, but hardly a key player, mostly just mouth. Worse still, she represents a dilapidated blue-city part of Los Angeles while not living there, and she directs her appeals to white leftists who call her “Auntie Maxine.” Her mileage isn’t impressive. Her focused support for impeachment is actually a reminder to black voters that she’s not doing anything for her district.
With impeachment the sole focus, everything else has gone by the wayside. No legislation is going to get passed; the only good things that happen are coming from President Trump. Democrats have effectively eclipsed themselves by ceding the ability to do good stuff to President Trump alone. And public support is evaporating broadly, with Pelosi acting worried and without a plan as impeachment extends to eternity now (she said there was no longer a deadline) and voter support, including the critical-to-Democrats black support peeling off. Democrats can’t win if they don’t have black support and right now, a majority of black voters and a huge number of Hispanic voters have dropped support from the Democrats’ only issue.
It’s the stuff of nightmares for Democrats. Any wonder a top Democratic strategist has just come out and begged Democrats to scrap the whole thing? That’s how bad it’s got. Black and Hispanic voters aren’t stupid like these Trump-obsessed Democrats. They’re pretty much like the rest of us.
On Sunday’s broadcast of CBS’s “Face the Nation,” White House counselor Kellyanne Conway said former New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg entry into the 2020 presidential race showed the Democratic field was “underwhelming.”
Conway said, “It means that the Democratic field is underwhelming, even to someone like Michael Bloomberg. There are 18 Democrats still running for president of the United States, Margaret, with probably another 10 or 12 already dropped out of the race. And Michael Bloomberg is coming in saying, ‘I don’t think any of you can beat Donald Trump.’ For all the talk about electability, that’s a fiction. You don’t know if somebody can or can’t win until they do or don’t.”
November 23, 2019
The Inevitable Impeachment
The Democrats and members of the deep state say that they do not want to impeach the President. Speaker Nancy Pelosi is praying for him. But blinded by their rage, they will do it in spite of the damage that their actions have done and are doing to our country.
Sometime soon, House Democrats will impeach Donald J. Trump, the man elected by the people, to be our President and to lead our country.
That is a sad realization for those Americans who love the United States of America and who appreciate what President Trump has accomplished in spite of ceaseless and continuous Democrat obstructions raised to oppose all his efforts to fulfill his promises to the people of America. (Just think what Americans might have been able to accomplish in the last three years if Democrats had cooperated with President Trump rather than oppose him at every turn.)
In the beginning, those who believe firmly that it is they who have the position, the intelligence, and the right to govern America as they please, i.e. , the professional political class and the members of the unelected bureaucracy, must have snickered and smirked at the thought of Trump’s absurd announcement. Trump for President. What a joke that was! What a ridiculous candidate!
However, the snickers and smirks soon gave way to grave concern. This man could be a problem. He was not beguilingly schmoozing the electorate with the typical politician’s platitudes. In fact, he had a different message, and he was talking to a different group of people. He was not talking to the “elite” in order to give them the usual assurances that they should relax because he just wanted to be elected and that he did not intend to change anything. Also, he was talking to the people rather than to the elite ruling class.
Even worse, he was telling the people that he did indeed intend to do things differently. He wanted to make changes in our economic and political system so that the people could have a better life. He even said that he wanted to make “America great again.” (The ruling class must have shuddered at such a frightening thought. This America was the one that they had created, and they were sure that they knew what was right for us, the deplorables. They did not want any changes. They wanted to keep the swamp just the way it was.)
To the surprise of the politicians and bureaucrats resting in cushy positions for life, Donald Trump triumphed over a large number of other candidates to become the Republican candidate for President. What an unexpected turn of events!
Then, the campaign began. He wanted to lower taxes. He wanted to increase the budget for the military. He wanted to control the border. He wanted to bring manufacturing from overseas back to America. He did not trust the media. He declared that he would drain the swamp in Washington.
This man had to be stopped! The members of the deep state made plans, “insurance plans” they called them, with which to tar Donald J. Trump.
Then, in November of 2016, came the shock. Trump won the Presidency. They could not believe that such an upset was possible. Hillary’s coronation was already assumed. The victory party was planned and prepared. Those in the know were sure, but the people decided otherwise. The pundits were stunned. Tears flowed. They could not contain their grief. How could the voters have committed this terrible deed, one that was so opposed to their wishes?
Alarm bells began to sound. The call for resistance rang out across the swamp, through all the bureaucrat offices, and among the lifetime politicians. President Trump must be removed from office. This mistake by those who voted for him must be overturned!
And so it began. The DNC paid for a British foreign agent to dig up dirt on candidate Trump. The result was the Steele dossier used by the FBI to obtain FISA warrants to spy on American citizens. They claimed that candidate Trump colluded with the Russians to undermine the American election. They charged him over and over again with obstruction of justice. Through a series of subterfuges, including the assistance of FBI director James Comey, they appointed Robert Mueller, a friend of Comey’s, as special counsel to investigate Russia collusion. Mueller appointed twelve liberal lawyers, who supported Hillary Clinton, to investigate. Over two years and approximately thirty million dollars of taxpayer money later, Mueller concluded that there was no collusion between the Trump campaign and the Russians.
One of the next plans was to use the 25th Amendment to the Constitution as a justification for declaring President Trump unfit to continue as President.
Another ploy was to wear a microphone to collect examples of President Trump’s erratic behavior.
Finally, they initiated the impeachment inquiry in response to the complaint of a so-called “whistleblower” who claimed on the basis of what he had others say that President Trump had attempted to bribe Ukrainian officials to give him information on a potential political opponent. At first, the charge was a “quid pro quo”, which became “extortion, which was later changed to “bribery”, and which finally returned to “quid pro quo”.
In the movie The Ten Commandants, the Pharaoh says, “So let it be written; so let it be done,” and it was. He was the most powerful man in the country.
However, as readers may remember, later the Israelites crossed the sea safely on dry land while it was the Pharaoh who succumbed to the powerful waves that inundated him.
Democrats now own the unintended consequences which they have unleashed. They deserve what they have brought on themselves by their actions over the last three years.
We need not despair.
Let us resolve to create a wave of support for President Trump next November in order to send the deep state, the media, and the swamp the message that in America, according to our belief and to the Constitution, final authority for our government resides in the governed, not those who govern.
November 22, 2019
Sorry Dems, ‘High crimes and misdemeanors’ are not whatever The House of Representatives says they are
It seems to be ”accepted wisdom” that impeachment and prosecution in the Senate are fundamentally political acts, along the lines of the equally “accepted wisdom” that a grand jury will even “indict a ham sandwich.” One need only review the report of the House Judiciary Committee charged with considering the impeachment of President Nixon to recognize that the “accepted wisdom” is sorely lacking. Implicit in its “logic” is that, in light of the separation of powers doctrine, impeachment proceedings are unreviewable by a court and thus, whatever Congress does in in the case of impeachment is “the law of the land”, no matter how arbitrary or capricious.
But if that is so, why did the Framers include in the Constitution the specific legal terms “treason”, “bribery” and “other high crimes and misdemeanors,” and why did they designate the Chief Justice, the highest-ranking member of the judicial branch to preside over the impeachment trial in the Senate or, for that matter, empower the Senate to impeach judges as well as a sitting president?
Does the Constitution bar the Chief Justice from doing what trial and appellate judges do every day, i.e., entertain motions to dismiss cases for failure to state a claim. Courts have specific rules that allow for such motions – which address situations in which accepting as true all facts stated in a complaint, the plaintiff has failed to state a valid legal claim recognized at law. The Senate can adopt a similar rule if the House sends over to it articles of impeachment, thereby insuring the Chief Justice can decide such a referral on motion, if he determines the House has failed to state a claim, I.e. the facts alleged do not meet the legal definition of, for instance, “high crimes and misdemeanors”
In 1974, the House Judiciary Committee, researching ancient English law dating back to the 14th century, adopted the English construction of that phrase, in effect imposing a standard for the Senate to use in adjudicating whether the acts alleged meet that definition adopted by the House. And in a report issued on this very point, the Committee concluded:
It is a technical term. It is used in a very old statute of that country whose language is our language, and whose laws form the substratum of our laws. It is scarcely conceivable that the term was not employed by the framers of our constitution in the sense which had been affixed to it by those from whom we borrowed it
According to scholarly sources, impeachable acts include “not prosecuting cases” and “arresting a man to keep him from running for Parliament.”‘
If President Trump did not investigate and prosecute potential crimes committed by Joe and Hunter Biden, and others, might that not itself be impeachable. And could it not be argued that Obama’s apparent authorization of the arrest and prosecution of Trump campaign personnel and others, all to block Trump from continuing his campaign for president, were impeachable offenses on the part of Obama. And to the extent Biden and other officials are subject to removal through impeachment, they too engaged in ostensibly impeachable offenses, e.g., the illegal surveillance of American citizens, lying to Congress about that surveillance, and lying to the FISA court that they too have engaged in “high crimes and misdemeanors.”
Adam Schiff and his colleagues apparently ignored, or simply tossed into the circular file, the serious, studied conclusions of the Watergate-era Judiciary Committee, at the time, of course, controlled by the Democrats. Their hubris and disdain for that Committee’s recitation of what they concluded was controlling “law” will cost them dearly.”
November 22, 2019
Fiona Hill Testifies that Obama Was Putin’s Puppet
While the fake news media are trying to convince you that Trump investigating the obvious and blatant corruption of the Biden family in Ukraine is a crime, one of their witnesses declared that Obama danced to Putin’s tune.
Fiona Hill testified that Obama refused to give military aid to Ukraine despite the fact that the “interagency” — the unelected wonks like Vindman who think they not Trump should run foreign policy — said that the U.S. should provide weapons to Ukraine to defend themselves against the Russian invasion.
Hill testified that Obama refused to provide lethal aid to Ukraine so as to not upset Putin.
That’s pretty clear evidence that Obama, not Trump, was in Putin’s pocket.
Hill’s testimony also creates problems for the Democrats’ impeachment narrative.
After all, the elite policy wonks said the U.S. should arm Ukraine to help defeat Russia’s invasion, but Obama said he wouldn’t because that would make Putin mad. Given that the Democrats are saying in the impeachment hearings that Trump temporarily not following the “guidance” of the interagency is an impeachable offense, clearly, Obama’s permanent rejection of the interagency guidance must also be a crime.
What Republicans are doing is using the impeachment farce to shine a light on the many failings of the Democrats that the fake news media will never cover, including how the Democrats, not Republicans, have always been on Russia’s side.
To see who was really putting America first, we can compare Obama’s deference to Putin to Trump’s actions that have gone directly against Putin’s interest, such as provided weapons to Ukraine. Trump held the military aid up for a short time only because of his concerns about corruption and the fact the Europeans should be providing more aid to Ukraine. Unlike Obama Trump did what Putin didn’t want done and what the interagency wanted done.
But that’s not the only evidence we have that Obama was dancing to Putin’s tune.
In March 2012 Obama told Russian president Dimitry Medvedev the following: “On all these issues, particularly on missile defense, this, this can be solved but it’s important for him to give me space[.]”
Putin did give Obama space and didn’t act aggressively during the 2012 campaign, which is why Obama was able to mock Mitt Romney for Romney’s concern about Russian aggression.
Why did Putin agree? Because Obama also told Medvedev this: “This is my last election. After my election I have more flexibility.”
That’s far from the only example of Obama doing Putin’s bidding for political gain. Here’s a few things that Obama did that really helped Putin:
1. Obama “reset” our relationship with Russia even though Russia continued to hold pieces of the country of Georgia that they had taken by force.
2. Obama let a Russian company get control of 20% of U.S. uranium reserves.
3. Obama canceled a missile defense system for Europe, which was designed to prevent Iran from being able to blackmail the E.U. because Putin didn’t like it.
4. Obama set up a deal with Iran, a Russian client in the Middle East, so that Iran would be able to develop nuclear weapons once Obama was out of office.
5. When the Russian client running Syria used chemical weapons against civilians, Obama did nothing despite having proclaimed that to be a red line. Instead, he turned the problem over to the Russians, who we now know allowed their client to retain some chemical weapons.
Compare that to how Trump’s been treating Putin:
1. Got Germany to cancel a massive natural gas deal with Russia which cost Putin billions.
2. Got NATO to significantly increase defense spending.
3. Increased sanctions on Iran to get them to stop nuclear weapon development.
4. Bombed the Russian client’s air base in Syria in response to the Syrian government using chemical weapons against civilians.
5. Significantly increased U.S. defense spending.
6. Provided lethal aid to the Ukrainians to help them fight off the Russian invasion.
7. Has told Russia to get its troops out of Venezuela.
8. Has increased sanctions on Russian entities.
This part of an interesting pattern where Democrats accuse Trump of crimes that he isn’t committing but Democrats are. Examples include the following:
- Accusing Trump of “bribing” Ukraine when in fact that’s what Biden did.
- Accusing Trump of going easy on Putin when in fact that’s what Obama did.
- Accusing Trump of putting kids in cages when in fact that’s what Obama did.
- Accusing Trump of financial crimes and profiting from his office when in fact that’s what Hillary did.
- Accusing Trump of being racist when it’s the Democrats who ignore the mass shooting of blacks in Chicago and deny black kids decent educations.
The reality is simple: the whole story that Trump and Republicans are soft on the Russians is a big lie. Since back in the old days, when leftists supported Hitler because he was allied with Russia, ’til the present, leftists have always supported Russia and said that it is a great place.
That changed only when leftists thought Putin might have hurt Hillary, or more likely because they thought he’d be a good scapegoat to blame Hillary’s loss on while attempting to convince the American people that Trump isn’t really the president.
While the fake news media won’t cover it, Fiona Hill’s testimony shows that not only are the Democrats condemning Trump for something they said was great when Obama did it, but it was Obama, not Trump, who did Putin’s bidding in return for help getting elected.
Given the lack of conservative media outlets, you need to help save America by telling your friends these facts. Given the truth, most people who vote for Democrats wouldn’t do so, so do your part and flood the U.S. with truth. As Scripture says “the truth shall set you free.”
November 20, 2019
Why it’s wrong to investigate Democratic corruption
One of Adam Schiff’s many rules for his kangaroo court hearings designed to convince the American people that up is down is that testimony related to whether or not the Bidens are a corrupt criminal enterprise is forbidden.
According to Schiff, it doesn’t matter if Joe Biden was bribed through his son to ensure that the investigation into Burisma’s corruption by the Ukraine government was shut down.
Assuming Schiff isn’t doing that simply because it goes against his Big Lie tells us that Schiff believes that it’s wrong to investigate Democratic corruption.
We know that Schiff has no problem with Democrats pressuring Ukraine to investigate people related to Trump even when there is no evidence of wrongdoing. When three Democratic senators wrote a threatening letter in 2018 demanding that Ukraine reopen investigations into people with political ties to Trump, Schiff uttered not a single word of condemnation.
This is just one more example of how Democrats believe themselves to be above the law. We see it over and over. Obama, by his own admission, violated the Constitution with his DACA proclamation and now Democrats say that Trump can’t overturn it, as though Obama’s decrees are somehow above those of any other president.
Democrats tell us that Hillary’s gross negligence in handling critical classified information is okay even as a sailor went to the brig for a much less egregious violation of the same law.
If you’re wondering about Trump’s actions, ask yourself this question: if Democrats had clear irrefutable evidence of Trump Jr engaging in corrupt acts in the Ukraine and a Democratic president asked the Ukrainians to investigate would you think that was wrong?
Yet there is clear unambiguous evidence of Joe and Hunter Biden’s corruption in the Ukraine.
- Hunter Biden received around $3.1 million from a corrupt Ukraine company, Burisma, despite the fact that he never went to Ukraine and knows nothing about the energy business.
- Hunter Biden has publicly admitted that he only got the job with Burisma because he’s Joe’s son.
- Hunter got his sweet gig after his dad was made the point man for the US on Ukraine policy
- Joe Biden is on video saying he used a quid pro quo, denying US aid, to get the prosecutor who was investigating Burisma fired thereby ending the investigation.
- The only foreign prosecutor that Biden has ever personally ensured was fired just happened to be the one investigating his son.
- Burisma used the Biden name to try and get special meetings with the State Department
Most commentary about the Biden’s corruption assumes that Joe was protecting Hunter, but any investigation by Ukraine would have been unlikely to directly impact Hunter; the U.S. would never extradite him. So perhaps what really happened is that Burisma bought Joe Biden by funneling money through Hunter Biden. Then when Burisma was in trouble they had Biden shut down the investigation not to protect Hunter but to protect the corrupt Ukrainians who run Burisma.
In the real world, if some shady character wants to bribe a politician they don’t write a check that would leave a paper trail. Instead they give some relative a fake job and funnel money into the family that way.
Even if Joe Biden himself never saw a cent, Joe benefited because his son got rich.
As you listen to the kangaroo court hearings remember that if you think that a President has the responsibility to look into corruption by his predecessors then even if there was a quid pro quo what Trump did was right. Few of us want to live in a world where corruption by Democrats can never be investigated.
November 19, 2019
Clinton Foundation bleeding money with no Clintons in high office
The Bill, Hillary and Chelsea Clinton Foundation can no longer raise enough money to cover its expenses, ever since Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign failed to propel her into an office from which she could dispense political favors. Clinton Foundation reports to the IRS for the last two tax years have demonstrated that without anyone to grant boons, fewer donors are interested in supporting it.
Andrew Stiles reports for the Free Beacon:
The Clinton Foundation reported a loss of more than $16 million in 2018, according to newly released tax records, marking the second consecutive year of losses since Hillary Clinton’s humiliating defeat to President Donald J. Trump in 2016.
The foundation reported total revenue of just $30.7 million, including $24.2 million worth of grants and contributions, a record low for the alleged “charity.” That figure was well short of the foundation’s total expenses for the year—$47.5 million— resulting in a net loss of $16.8 million.
The previous year, the Clinton Foundation reported a net loss of $16.1 million. In total, the organization has lost a staggering $32.9 million since Hillary Clinton’s lifelong quest for the presidency crumbled to dust in November 2016.
The contrast with previous years when political favors were a lure is striking:
The Clinton Foundation posted its highest revenue haul ($249 million) in 2009, the year Hillary was sworn in as President Barack Obama’s secretary of state. By 2013, the foundation had reported an additional $392.2 million in revenue, and went on to raise $344.4 million between 2014 and 2016.
Between 2008 and 2016, the Clinton Foundation reported total revenue in excess of $1.1 billion, or an annual average of $130.4 million. Needless to say, Clinton’s stunning failure to defeat Donald Trump in the 2016 election appears to have had a significant impact on the foundation’s ability to raise money.
US Attorney for Utah, John Huber, has been tasked with investigating the Clinton Foundation. So far there has not been a single leak out of his office over its work. That could mean either that they have turned up nothing, or that the investigation and grand jury are proceeding with the secrecy that the law demands.
November 19, 2019
Trump is 100% on His Game
I thank God that President Trump is not like other Republicans.
It truly amazes me that many high-profile conservatives and Republicans still wish Trump would dial it back, not be so confrontational, and behave more presidentially. I feel like saying, “Are you guys nuts? Have you not been paying attention?” Desperate times require desperate measures. Donald Trump is God’s perfect man in the White House for such a time as this.
Do these people who are supposedly on our side not understand what is at stake? If Trump is not reelected in 2020, Democrats will kill healthy babies even after they are born.
Sixteen-year-old girls will have double mastectomies without parental consent or knowledge in absurd attempts to become men.
Democrats will roll out the red carpet to drug dealing, murderous illegals along with illegal alien children carrying strange diseases being admitted into our schools. The Democrats’ Green New Deal promises to stop air travel, kill the fossil fuel industry, and implement a long list of insane job-killing and economy crushing initiatives. You cannot imagine the huge number of jobs Democrats will kill or force overseas. Trump has our economy booming. Black unemployment has hit a new historic low. All of Trump’s unprecedented remarkable successes for America will be flushed down the toilet if Democrats take the White House.
Therefore, I do not care if Trump is what some would describe as rude to Democrats and fake news media. These people are arrogant, nasty, and view everyday Americans as their inferiors. Every time Trump fearlessly gets into their snooty faces, a huge smile appears on my face and I say, “Thank you, God!”
It has been revealed that a few days after Trump was elected in 2016, Democrats, the deep state, and fake news media launched their coup to remove him from office. In essence they said, “Screw idiot American voters. We will not allow this guy to interrupt our plans for America’s decline and transformation.”
This is why Washington swamp dwellers are infuriated by Trump’s slogan, “Make America Great Again.” They are obsessed with removing Trump from office by any, I repeat any, means necessary.
Frustrated that every play in their Destroy-the-Republican-Playbook has failed against Trump, Democrats’ and fake news medias’ hatred for Trump and his supporters has grown to pure foaming-at-the-mouth rabid insanity.
For you folks on our side who still wish Trump was kinder and gentler, the truth is that no other Republican could have survived. Trump has the perfect instincts to fight and emerge victorious in this openly treasonous and extremely corrupt political climate.
With all due respect, Republicans like Ken Starr still do not comprehend the levels of evil and corruption that are threatening our constitutional freedoms and rights. Starr said Trump made a mistake “attacking” Yovanovitch in a tweet while she testified in Democrats’ outrageous kangaroo court impeachment hearings. Starr said presidents usually rely on others to defend their position. Again, I say that these are not usual times.
Democrats and fake news media portrayed former ambassador Marie Yovanovitch as a saintly human being, slightly lower than the angels.
Democrats and fake news medias’ heads exploded when Trump dared to tweet the truth about Yovanovitch. She is an Obama loyalist who sought to undermine the new Ukrainian president and Trump’s policy. Acting within his presidential authority, Trump wisely fired Yovanovitch.
If Trump did not use his bully pulpit to expose the real Yovanovitch, the public would be deceived. Democrats and fake news media would have sold the American people their lie that Yovanvitch is an innocent sweet woman, unjustly fired by our mean misogynist president.
Starr is an old-school Washington guy who believes the president must always behave presidentially. The standard rule for Republican presidential behavior is to remain passive and dignified while Democrats and fake news media lies, and implements, every disgusting trick that their sick minds can conceive to destroy a Republican.
God knew what He was doing when He made a Washington outsider leader of the free world. It drives Washington elites insane that Trump refuses to be intimidated into allowing them to dictate his behavior, surrendering to Washington elites’ one-sided rules of engagement.
But folks, what is truly amazing to watch is every time Trump exposes Democrats and deep-state traitors caught with their hands in the corruption cookie jar, Democrats and their fake news media minions try to turn it around on Trump; portraying him as the one breaking the law. The insidious evil and arrogance of these people is off the chain.
Rest assured folks, Trump is 100% on his game. Let’s make sure to have his back in 2020.
Remember the lyric in the Billy Joel song, “I love you just the way you are”? Please Mr. President, don’t go changin’. We love you just the way you are.