A Mind-Blowing Interview.

Posted in Politics, Video | Tagged | Leave a comment

Germans overwhelmingly victims of migrant crimes.

Germans Under Siege

Police stats reveal Germans overwhelmingly victims of migrant crimes.

“…civilization is precious good, whose delicate complex of order and freedom, culture and peace, can at any moment be overthrown by barbarians invading from without or multiplying within.”
-Will Durant, historian

It is a situation that the left-leaning German media averts its eyes from because it disrupts the multicultural idyll it promotes: that Germans are, overwhelmingly, the victims of migrant crime.

But leftist journalists’ looking away does not prevent German police from putting the real face on this terrible situation.

“Germans were more often the victim of a crime committed by a migrant than the other way around,” stated Germany’s Federal Crime Office in a publication titled “Criminality in the Context of Migration.”

And crime statistics provided by the German national newspaper, Die Welt, unfortunately, bear this out. The Federal Crime Office stated that in 2018 230 Germans fell victim to the crimes of murder and manslaughter, committed by a least one migrant suspect, while 33 asylum seekers were killed by German suspects.

The Federal Crime Office’s statistics in the area of sexual assault are even worse. In 2018, police recorded 3,261 sexual assaults against German women by migrants, a 21 percent increase over 2017, while 33 women asylum seekers were sexually assaulted by Germans.

All this is in contrast to 2017 where 13 Germans were killed by asylum seekers, while others were victims of attempted murder. No asylum seekers were killed by Germans that year. Also in 2017, police recorded 2,706 German victims of migrant sexual crimes, while 74 asylum seekers were victims of sex crimes committed by Germans.

These stats show with precision that the liberal/left wing assertion that migrants are threatened by right wing radicals or “those hostile to foreigners” is false and a “very narrow one.” As the stats prove, it is obviously the other way round. Anti-German leftists are probably also unhappy that these same statistics show the number of crimes committed by Germans has been going down for years.

These migrant crime stats would not have surprised Karen Hiesig, a German youth court judge in Berlin.

In her evaluation of migrant youth crime, which she documented in her 2010 book Das Ende der Geduld (The End of Patience), she found “that youths with a migrant background commit violent crime more often than German youths.” (Hiesig says her statement does not pertain to Asians.)

“The criminals are overwhelmingly of Turkish or Arab background and the victims are overwhelmingly German,” noted Hiesig. “The brutality has increased extremely. I myself, who have been a judge for 16 years, have been in part alarmed in what form it has taken against the victim.”

Hiesig goes on to state in her book that repeat criminals with 30 “serious” crimes are 90 per cent foreigners; 45 per cent are of Arab background, and 34 per cent are Turkish.

“Arabs present by far, with their share of the population, the majority of serious criminals,” states Hiesig, noting that “the more serious the crime, the higher the portion of foreigners.”

Hiesig also downplays the involvement of radical right-wing youth in crime, a view promoted by the left, observing that the right “does not by a long shot play the role that is attributed to it.”

The problem with migrant crime, according to Hiesig, is that many migrants came to Germany with no intention of integrating. The city district Berlin-Neukolln, for example, which has the highest foreigner population in Germany that includes many Muslims, has a “large criminal problem.”

“There are, moreover, in Germany migrants who never intended to adjust, but always to live in a parallel, in some cases, in a purely criminally arranged structure and, from my point of view, intend largely to continue so,” Hiesig wrote.

Migrants are so violent, Hiesig writes, that it is very dangerous for authorities to take a child from the family of one of Berlin’s many Arab criminal clans.

“One cannot forcibly take a child away from an Arab criminal clan,” Hiesig writes. “They will shoot you.”

A major factor for migrant youth crime, Hiesig note, is the failure to get a school graduation diploma. Seventy percent of migrant youth don’t graduate due to absenteeism, criminal lifestyles and alcohol and drug consumption. Drug and alcohol consumption are also often factors in migrant crime.

Other factors include migrant youths coming from homes where the boys are extremely spoiled by their mothers and boundaries are never set for them. Parents also fail in their supervisory duty, allowing the boys to hang around in the streets until all hours of the night where they fall under the influence of older, criminal youth gang members, thus spoiling their chances for a decent future.

“There are youth gangs who make more and more monsters out of children,” wrote Udo Ulfkotte in his 2009 book Vorsicht Burgerkrieg! (Watch Out: Civil War!). “These multicultural primates then go like unleashed fighting machines on their environment.”

Migrant youth also learn in their homes that violence is acceptable. According to Hiesig, they are subjected to domestic violence much more than German youths. And parents also convey to their children to respect only those who show “toughness.”

Hieisg, who led a very courageous life, was noted for handing out tough sentences to migrant criminal youths, many of them repeat criminals convicted of serious crimes, when other judges were coddling them. Hence the title of her book, The End of Patience. She had personally run out of patience with migrant youth criminals.

This may have been the cause of her death as she was found hanging from a tree in a Berlin forest. The police ruled it very quickly a suicide, but none of her legal colleagues believed it. They suspect one of Berlin’s Arab or Turkish criminal clans may have killed her in retaliation for the tough sentences she was giving to their younger members.

But it also isn’t just ordinary Germans who are victims of migrant violence. Police have become a favorite target for migrant assaults. Ulfkotte has noted this trend.

‘Police are attacked,” he wrote. “Everywhere in Europe we have gotten used to it. Respect for the police seems to be an antique relic of a greying generation.”

German children also fear and are deeply affected by migrant violence though they don’t often figure into the crime statistics.

“According to the victim protection organization ‘White Ring,’” Ulfkotte writes, “every third German elementary school child goes to school with fear of mobbing, beatings, robbery extortion. And those who beat, rob and extort are often children of migrants.”

And while every school child should love recess, not so in Germany. Again, according to Ulfkotte, “every third pupil fears going to the schoolyard for recess” because of violence from mainly migrant children.

Kurdish-German lawyer Gulsen Celbi probably summarizes correctly why Germans don’t criticize violent migrants. The Germans, she says, are suffering from a “Nazi defect.”

“They don’t trust themselves to criticize violent migrants because they fear being called radical right-wingers,” she stated.

Hiesig does not see things as improving for the native German population.

“There is found in certain social hot spots a hostile, anti-society and increasingly anti-semitic way of thought that, in consideration of the long-term demographic development in Germany, can get out of hand against the non-migrant population,” she wrote.

She names as an example a trial involving Turkish and Kurdish youths who told young German women in a bus that “One can only gas Germans.” The shock, Hiesig states, was “tangible.”

Uflkotte is also pessimistic about Germany’s future because there is an “elevator effect” in his country.

“But in a multicultural society it unfortunately does not travel upwards but constantly downwards,” he writes.

And as far as migrant crime against Germans is concerned, Ulfkotte says it is better to look away.

“We have accustomed ourselves to look away: with garbage, broken windows, and with passersby who are being beaten. As a normal citizen, it is better to look away. Otherwise, one can become a victim.”

Via:

Posted in Crime, Politics | Tagged | Leave a comment

Conservatives have a street fighter

Finally, conservatives have a street fighter as president

By Steve Grammatico
———————————

Has there been a president in living memory who relishes a fight more than Trump?  I don’t think so. That is a major reason why he remains popular with conservatives and has seen his favorability ratings rise.

Sure, I like President Trump’s actions on job-killing regulations, tax relief, border security, energy independence, military funding, judicial appointments, and so on.  But what really invigorates me and millions of other EverTrumpers is that he is fearless — impervious to attacks by his adversaries and merciless in responding to them.

Trump is an oddity: a Republican president who stands up to the Left’s defamations and brickbats and returns fire.  His prickly personality is one driving force; another is Twitter, the social media megaphone he uses to bypass the legacy media’s censors.

Especially gratifying to his base is Trump’s war on PC and his refusal to be restrained by liberals’ standards of what constitutes acceptable speech.  Go after him and your race or ethnicity will not protect you from his wrath.  House Oversight Chairman Elijah Cummings learned this lesson recently, to his chagrin.  In a nation where Trumpers are afraid to wear a MAGA cap in public, who else would dare to call out a civil rights icon on conditions in his district? 

The drumbeat of criticism and calumny directed at the president by his political opponents and the media have had no discernible physical or emotional effect on him, except perhaps to make him more energetic and determined, and his tweets more sharply worded and devastating.  Meanwhile, those who spew venom in their rage against the man are diminished.  (See the latest comment by Rob “Meathead” Reiner.)  As he fends off with alacrity the daily assaults on his character, intelligence, and motives, supporters like me are heartened.

TDS hard cases appear to believe the deplorables will desert Trump in droves after he is impeached and in the dock.  Wishful thinking.  Not only will the base remain loyal, his favorability will continue to increase when independents and fence sitters tune in and get a load of insufferable Democratic prosecutors trying to make something of nothing.

More reasonable Trump haters hope a Senate trial tarnishes Trump and his presidency leading up to November 2020.  More likely, voters would punish Democrats for inflicting a show trial on the nation.

In their efforts to convince America Trump is the problem, the perpetrators of the Deep State coup and their allies are buttressing the case that Trump is the solution to what ails America.

When the president arguably goes over the top, I might shake my head a little, and then I forget it.  I’ve waited a long time for a street fighter on my side of the political divide to occupy the Oval Office.  It’s finally happened, and I couldn’t be more pleased.

Via:

Posted in Politics | Tagged | Leave a comment

Austin, TX officials seek to gag cops

After legalizing homeless camping on city land, Austin, TX officials seek to gag cops talking about problems

By Thomas Lifson
—————————-

To the shock of nobody who lives in the real world, the decision of the Austin, TX City Council last June to legalize homeless encampments on city owned land, including parks and sidewalks (but not in front of City Hall, where the council meets), has led to lots of problems for the self-sufficient populace, and thus to calls to the Austin Police for help. What follows sounds like satire written by Iowahawk. The Austin Statesman reports:

 Late last month, intergovernmental relations officer Brie Franco pointed Austin Police Department Chief Brian Manley and others to a neighborhood post online about homelessness.

In the post, a resident said Austin police officers who answered his 911 call about a suspicious homeless man warned him that the city is in the beginning stages of a public crisis, similar that shown in the documentary “Seattle is Dying.” The resident, who is not identified but lives off South Congress Avenue, wrote that officers recommended he “write (Council Member Ann Kitchen) and continue to call 911.” The man also wrote that officers told him that under current city law, they are limited in what they can do.

In passing along the post, Franco noted: “It contains references to how some officers have responded to certain situations regarding the homeless, so I thought it was best to share with you.”

Why, you can’t allow police officers to speak to voters this way! How dare they predict that the problem, which is worsening, will get even worse! How dare they point to Seattle, where similar policies have allowed the homeless to take over entire neighborhoods! And how dare they tell voters to contact the elected officials who made the policy that has led to the problem!

Austin homeless encampment in a park (YouTube screen grab)

It was one of several examples in recent weeks that has city officials concerned about how police officers are talking about the city’s homeless policies in routine interactions with residents or while responding to calls, emails obtained by the American-Statesman indicate.

But don’t worry. The police bureaucrats are on the case:

Several police administrators subsequently sent messages to officers with guidance on what they should and shouldn’t say in their interactions with the public.

“Please, remind officers that it is unprofessional to tell concerned citizens to watch ‘Seattle is Dying’ and warn them that we are in the beginning stages,” Assistant Chief Todd Smith wrote Aug. 1. “Inferring we can’t do anything with dangerous people is misleading and causes unnecessary fear.”

We certainly wouldn’t want any “unnecessary fear.” But when drug-addled people unable to fend for themselves take up residence in front of your house and place of business, relieving themselves without benefit of plumbing, isn’t a certain degree of fear prudent?

Apparently, the cops on the street think so, but the bureaucrats don’t:

According to the resident’s post flagged by Franco, officers who responded to his call also told him that the homeless man who prompted the 911 call “is very dangerous when he is high. He also said if he had been sleeping on the grass by the street, he would have been unable to do anything about it because of the new laws.”

Cops who have to deal with these problems talking frankly to citizens who have to deal with them is the real problem… if you are a bureaucrat or a politician. And what’s not the problem: following the same path that’s led California and Washington cities toward typhus, rats, excrement in the streets, and aggressive panhandling.

Via:

Posted in Crime, Politics | Tagged | Leave a comment

Stunning New Revelations

Posted in Politics, Video | Tagged | Leave a comment

Federal Student Debt for Wounded Warriors

Donald Trump Cancels Federal Student Debt for Wounded Warriors

Charlie Spiering, 16,886
 

President Donald Trump signed a memorandum effectively canceling federal student debt loans for America’s wounded warriors on Wednesday.

“Veterans who have made such enormous sacrifices for our country should not be asked to pay any more, rather it is America who owes our heroes a supreme debt of gratitude,” he said.

The president spoke to the AMVETS Convention in Kentucky on Wednesday, announcing his decision and signing the document.

Trump said the memorandum would effectively cancel the federal student debts of thousands of wounded American veterans.

According to the White House, the memorandum orders Secretaries of Education and Veterans Affairs to expedite totally and permanently that disabled veterans have their Federal student loan debt discharged with minimal burdens.

Trump also touted his administration’s accomplishments for America’s military veterans.

“After years of neglect, we are fixing the heartbreaking failures from the last Administration at the Department of Veterans Affairs,” he said. “America must never abandon our heroes in their hour of need.”

He said that wait times in Veterans Affairs hospitals had been slashed by 33 percent, and touted more VA accountability, allowing bad employees to get fired.

“Now when somebody mistreats you or mistreats people in the VA, we know what happens right?” he asked. “It’s called ‘You’re fired!’”

Veterans in the audience applauded and cheered after Trump said that over 7,600 faulty veterans affairs employees were fired from the system

“They’re gone, they’re fired,” Trump said.

Veterans also cheered Trump’s announcement that he had cut the amount of opioid drugs being prescribed by Veterans Affairs hospitals.

“Get a pain killer that’s not addictive,” Trump said. “And we’re closer than you think.”

Trump also spoke about preventing veteran suicides, suggesting that the government work to obtain a new nasal spray dose of fast-acting anti-depressant medicine to people experiencing suicidal thoughts.

The drug, Spravato, produced by Johnson and Johnson, was recently approved by the federal government.

“They’ve done so well in this country and they’ve made so much money, I think they should give it to us for free,” Trump said, referring to the pharmaceutical company.

Via:

Posted in Politics | Tagged | Leave a comment

Why we don’t trust the press

New York Times reminds us why we don’t trust the press

By Jack Hellner
————————–
We sat through eight years of Hurricane Barry abusing his power and not giving a damn about the law or the separation of powers, while most of the media cheered him on. We were even treated to stories of how the Obama/Biden years were scandal-free.

The media so liked Obama they colluded with other Democrats to protect the corrupt Hillary Clinton, his designated successor, from prosecution in order to elect her president. They used a clearly fictitious dossier as they sought to destroy Trump before and after the election.

The NYT executive editor is proud of the fake news stories on Russian collusion that they won Pulitzers for. (Isn’t that great that journalists get awards for excellence for false stories?)  Now that the public knows that it was always a fake story they now will seek to divide the country on race. In other words, there will be more attempts to mislead the public instead of report truthful news.

We can look forward to more false stories about Trump and Charlottesvile, the false ‘hands up don’t shoot narrative,’ the false stories trying to take out white Christian boys, endlessly ginning up racial hate with the term “white privilege” and calling Trump a racist for enforcing the immigration laws Congress passed as the Constitution and his oath requires. But in the meantime, we are getting this:

“We built our newsroom to cover one story, and we did it truly well,” Baquet told the assemblage. “Now we have to regroup, and shift resources and emphasis to take on a different story.”

Think about that statement for a minute. Baquet says he “built our newsroom” to cover a story which turns out to have been based on a hoax spread by Democrat Party operatives and used by a corrupt Obama administration to spy on innocent American citizens while attempting to prejudice a presidential election.

When the news media isn’t regurgitating false talking points on Russian collusion and race, they will continue their fake news about the economy. They have tried to talk down the economy since before Trump was elected and the attempts to mislead the public are endless.

The following story is a good example: They gave three examples of why the country might be heading into a recession.

The first was a one-day interest rate inversion and most of the media was screaming “recession” from the rafters. The next day the interest rate inversion disappeared and utter silence.

In the article below, the AP said that Trump’s tax cuts were unpopular. Most of the media, in collusion with other Democrats, have continually lied to the public that only the rich and corporations benefitted, and it is costing the government trillions of dollars even though revenues are going up. It is no surprise that a misled public is confused.

The second is consumer confidence is down a little from a high level. Is it any surprise that after years of the media bashing Trump with lies that consumer confidence would drop?

The third is that manufacturing has dropped a whopping ½ percent in the last year after it went up.

If journalists were honest, they would report how well the economy is doing vs. most of the world precisely because of Trump’s policies. It is obvious that most journalists would rather have a powerful government and slower economy with Democrats in power than ever considering telling the public the truth.

The financial markets signaled the possibility of a U.S. recession this week, sending a jolt of anxiety to investors, companies and consumers

Trump’s 2017 tax cut proved so politically unpopular that many Republicans ran away from it during last year’s midterms.

The Federal Reserve voted last month to trim rates for the first time since 2008, a step taken to insulate the economy against trade uncertainty. But consumers interpreted that as a precautionary move ahead of a downturn rather than as part of an effort to keep the economy growing, according to the University of Michigan’s consumer sentiment survey released Friday.

Consumer confidence has dropped 6.4% since July. The pessimism could worsen if the Fed decides to slash rates in accordance with Trump’s wishes.

One sector already suffering this year is manufacturing, the very industry that Trump pledged to revive and fortify with his tariffs. Factory output has fallen 0.5% during the past 12 months, the Fed said Thursday.

I wonder why the public has so little trust in the media.

Via:

Posted in Politics | Tagged | Leave a comment

Elizabeth Warren is a fraud

Elizabeth Warren is sorry…that she was caught

By Ethel C. Fenig
—————————

After her non-apology apology to American Indians for co-opting their ancestry for her own benefit, blonde, blue-eyed, high-cheekboned person of white color Massachusetts senator LieawathaPocahontas (D),  law professor and wealthy woman now using the American name Elizabeth Warren, is changing again.

Arrogantly assuming that a speck of DNA and her high cheekbones would prove her outrageous claims to American Indian minority group affiliation, thus bypassing meritocracy for victimhood to get ahead, she took a genetic test to back up her claims.  Her DNA tests proved that, like all humans, she had more common DNA with chimpanzees, but for some reason, she never tried to grease her way up the professional pole with that identity.  And the American Indians, including the Cherokees whom she tribally, genetically, culturally appropriated, not accepting DNA as proof of tribal membership, forcefully rejected her as a relative.

The chimpanzees refused to comment about such a lying individual who shares some of their DNA.

Her personal and professional gains assured no matter what, Warren is now ethnically cleansing her campaign website of her phony background.

Democratic Massachusetts Sen. Elizabeth Warren has removed sections of her campaign website that had disputed claims about her heritage, including the results of a DNA test that showed she had scant traces of Native American ancestry.

Until Sunday, Warren’s website included a video of the Democrat receiving the results of the genetic test, which showed that she had between 1/64th and 1/1024th Native American ancestry. Warren initially touted the results as a vindication of her claims throughout her academic career that she has Cherokee ancestry.

In April 1986, Warren listed herself as “Native American” on a Texas state bar registration form. Harvard Law School, where Warren taught before entering politics, referred to Warren as the schools only Native American professor as recently as 1996. Warren also listed herself as a minority in the Association of American Law Schools directory from 1986 to 1994.

Therefore, as of now, Warren is just another Democrat who will lie and scheme and do anything to get her way.  No genetic test needed.

Via:

Posted in Politics | Tagged | Leave a comment

Swedish Police

Swedish Police Accidentally Blow up Own Building After Motorbike Bomb Discovery

Police have cordoned off an area after an object exploded next to a police station in Rosengard in Malmo, Sweden on January 17, 2018. / AFP PHOTO / TT News Agency / Johan NILSSON / Sweden OUT (Photo credit should read JOHAN NILSSON/AFP/Getty Images)
JOHAN NILSSON/AFP/Getty Images
Chris Tomlinson, 403
 

A Swedish police warehouse building in Linköping was destroyed after the bomb squad detonated a motorbike filled with explosives.

The moped containing what has been described as some form of plastic explosive covered with nails was discovered on Monday afternoon by officers in a stolen property room, and led to the evacuation of around 170 personnel from the area, Swedish broadcaster Sveriges Radio reports.

Following the evacuation, the Swedish bomb squad was called in to make a controlled detonation of the explosives but, according to Sveriges Radio, something went wrong with the operation and a much larger blast than expected took place.

Police spokesman Erik Terneborn admitted that the detonation, “did not go quite as one had hoped” but said the officers had taken such a scenario into account when they evacuated the area.

The building was totally demolished and windows in nearby properties largely destroyed, but no injuries to officers or civilians have been reported.

Police held a press conference Tuesday explaining that the moped had been reported stolen in May of this year and that no explosives were discovered in it at the time it was found.

The explosives were not found until the owner of the moped came to collect it this week. Police say the owner is not suspected of having planted the explosives in the moped.

Daniel Axelsson, head of the department of serious crimes at the Linköping police aid that investigators were examining any possible connection to a large explosion at an apartment building in the city earlier this year that injured 25 people.

“When we find explosives in Linköping after there has been an explosion in the past, it is obvious that we are eager to see if there is a connection,” he said.

Sweden has seen a wave of explosions this year with many taking place in the multicultural city of Malmö, including three separate detonations in a mere 24-hour period in June.

Via:

Posted in Crime, Politics | Tagged | Leave a comment

Gun rights

President Trump: We Won’t Sacrifice Gun Rights to ‘Slippery Slope’

Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump stands at his podium during the Presidential Debate at Hofstra University on September 26, 2016 in Hempstead, New York. The first of four debates for the 2016 Election, three Presidential and one Vice Presidential, is moderated by NBC's Lester Holt. (Photo by Win McNamee/Getty Images)
Win McNamee/Getty
AWR Hawkins,1,363
 

President Trump suggested Democrats have given up any defense of the Second Amendment and pledged that he will not allow Americans’ gun rights to be swept away on the “slippery slope” of gun control.

Trump made the comments while speaking to reporters in the Oval Office on Tuesday.

He said, “We have very, very strong background checks right now. But we have, sort of, missing areas and areas that don’t complete the whole circle. And we’re looking at different things.”

He added, “And I have to tell you that it is a mental problem. And I’ve said it a hundred times: It’s not the gun that pulls the trigger; it’s the person that pulls the trigger. These are sick people, and it is also that kind of a problem.”

Trump was then asked point blank if he wanted to see Senate passage of gun control bills passed in the Democrat-controlled House. He responded:

Well, I’m not going to get into that.  But we are in very meaningful discussions with the Democrats.  And I think the Republicans are very unified.  We are very strong on our Second Amendment.  The Democrats are not strong at all on the Second Amendment.  I would say they’re weak on the Second Amendment, and we have to be careful of that.

He observed:

The Democrats would, I believe — I think they’d give up the Second Amendment.  And the people that — a lot of the people that put me where I am are strong believers in the Second Amendment — and I am, also.  And we have to be very careful about that.  You know, they call it the “slippery slope,” and all of the sudden, everything gets taken away.  We’re not going to let that happen.

Breitbart News reported that Trump used weekend comments to shift away from background checks.

Politico reported that Trump was asked about the background check gun control push and he said, “I’m not saying anything. I’m saying Congress is going to be reporting back to me with ideas. And they’ll come in from Democrats and Republicans. And I’ll look at it very strongly. But just remember, we already have a lot of background checks.”

Via:

Posted in Politics | Tagged | Leave a comment

PragerU v. YouTube

Posted in Politics, Video | Tagged | Leave a comment

IG report?

Can we finally get that IG report?

By Silvio Canto, Jr.
—————————

To be fair, IG Michael Horowitz is trying to do a complete job.  However, don’t blame some of us for being a bit impatient.   After all, how long have we’ve been waiting for this report?

According to Senator Graham, it will be nasty:

Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., is adamant about revealing what went on behind the scenes of the Russia investigation and is looking forward to the American people learning about what happened.

Graham pointed to three investigations of the investigators that are taking place: one by his committee; one by Connecticut U.S. Attorney John Durham, who was appointed by Attorney General Bill Barr to conduct a probe; and one by Justice Department Inspector General Michael Horowitz.

I will wait and give IG Horowitz the benefit of the doubt as far as the timing is concerned.

I have a few questions:

  • Who started this Russia collusion story that resulted in the Mueller probe?  Why did it take two years?
  • Who presented the phony dossier before the FISA court?  Who is going to be held accountable for that?
  • Did Hillary Clinton get special treatment on the email scandal?

It’s time for answers and hopefully we will have them soon.

Via:

Posted in Politics | Tagged | Leave a comment

Gun Control in a Dictatorship

The Role of Gun Control in Dictatorship

By Jeffrey T. Brown
—————————-

President Trump is accused on a minute-by-minute basis of being a tyrant, but his accusers remain free.  Nothing has been taken from them, not their property nor their personal liberty.  Their rights remain intact in every respect.  They can speak without fear of retribution.  They can assemble without fear of arrest.  They can say and do the most vile and corrupt things, knowing that because the president is not a tyrant, nothing will be done to them for their crusade to erode and destroy our current social and political systems.

While the president correctly identifies the propagandists in the leftist media as philosophical enemies of the people they work every day to conquer, he doesn’t announce any plans to unilaterally cancel or rescind their rights.  He does not threaten to make their words and intentions illegal.  He doesn’t threaten to trample the Bill of Rights because they hate him and the country he works to preserve and protect, often from them.  He has never once hinted at criminalizing their political opposition, or their open warfare on the Constitution and every civil protection enjoyed by Americans who refuse to subscribe to despotism.

On the left, however, the seeds are being sown to create a police state in which the politically compliant and complicit will be safe, but the holdouts will be brutally punished.  The New York Times, it has been revealed, is about to embark on their latest propaganda project, on the heels of their last foray into pervasive disinformation claiming the president was allied with Russia.  Now, the lie will be rampant racism which, if it did exist, wouldn’t need the New York Times telling us about it.  We would see and be alarmed by it on our own.  Preceding this effort has been the lie that virulent white supremacy is everywhere.  The illusion exacerbates the anger and hatred on the left, and solidifies their resolve to marginalize, demonize and attack anyone branded with this fabricated label.  Anyone who does not believe he should be punished for this lie will be branded a supremacist, as he obviously believes his rights entitle him to racism without consequence.  The accusation is all the evidence needed.

The object, of course, is not addressing actual white supremacy.  That is a lie told to dim-witted people who think that “others” whom they are taught to hate and fear are living in an entirely different version of the country than they live in, one they can’t see but believe is there.  The object is polarization and demonization, though not simply to whip up progressive hatred for normal Americans.  The larger purpose is to facilitate the oppression and eventual eradication of normal Americans who refuse to worship the golden calves of socialism and communism.

For years, the Democrats have smiled and told us that they have no intention of infringing rights, or taking anything away, or incarcerating their enemies, and we have known every time that they were lying.  We have watched them redefine the language to change the foundations which we used to share as a country and have known why they are doing it.  We have seen them progressively attack those who obey the laws, protect their families, pay their taxes, and wish to be left in peace.

Overthrowing a society is dirty work, however, and it has become clear that peace will only come with our surrender or their failure, and even then, failure will be temporary.  Eventually, there will be conflict, which brings us to the Second Amendment.  The fate of everything the Left intends depends in the end on whether normal, non-communist Americans have the power to make the price of dictatorship so high that the Left will be unwilling to force it to completion.  If Americans can be disarmed and neutralized, they can be imprisoned without trials.  If they can be made powerless, they can be shot at without fear that they’ll shoot back.  If they can be conquered, they can be subjugated and made to serve their totalitarian masters.

The Second Amendment was always about exactly this scenario.  The Founders did not insist on the Second Amendment so that they could hunt in perpetuity but because they feared a large, authoritarian government controlled by unethical and immoral politicians and their mobs.

Socialist/communist critics ridicule supporters of the Second Amendment, correctly noting that AR15s are no match for the firepower of the U.S. military, so resistance is futile and should be abandoned.  They are correct as to the first part but misdirecting as to the second.  Although the Second Amendment was intended to enable citizens to fight with equal tools against an army of oppression, there is no modern parity.  The AR15 is not a “weapon of war,” as no military in the world issues a semi-automatic-only rifle to their combat troops.  That description is a lie.  However, the second part of the critique, that we would be confronting the U.S. military so should give up now, is not necessarily what will develop.  That is, the socialists/communists will not control the military until they have overthrown the current form of government and seized all power, including law enforcement.

Should confrontations occur before then, they will not be with the military, and depending on the politics of law enforcement officers, may not be with the police.  Rather, the earliest violent confrontations will be with armed civilian mobs, successors to the ones we see now at the homes of political enemies, calling for their deaths and those of their family members.  This is foreseeable in the growing number of “John Brown Gun Clubs” around the country, which cater to fanatical leftists who learn to shoot, and train to varying degrees to serve as the civilian vigilante arm of the left.  Unlike normal Americans, who are motivated to defend themselves from irrational lunatics, these gun owners are training as an offensive force for the overthrow of capitalism and democratic republicanism.  So, how might this develop?

Democrats will again weaponize information, this time publishing names and addresses of gun owners and urging indoctrinated radicals, backed by complicit politicians, to go to those homes and do whatever they feel is necessary to make the locality “safe.”  This will be intended to cause gun owners to question whether gun ownership, and the assault on them and their families, is worth the terror the fascists will cause.  As the Left stokes the cultivated emotionalism of its unstable followers and urges them to greater acts of unpunished violence against innocents, the threshold will eventually be crossed.  As the propagandists scream then for even more violence, and more “control,” those who own guns will be reminded why they have them, and their resolve will deepen.  The question then will be how far the Left is prepared to go to usher in the next fascist socialist utopia.  They know how much easier this will all be if the guns are taken first.

Authoritarians have always understood that gun control is political control, which is why they don’t practice it against their own supporters.   Gun control is for political enemies, and both precedes and hastens the eventual purge necessary to dictatorship.  It really is that simple.

Via:

Posted in Politics | Tagged | Leave a comment

The Mystery Deepens.

Posted in Politics, Video | Tagged | Leave a comment

Chris “Fredo” Cuomo

Posted in Politics, Video | Tagged | Leave a comment