- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
June 30, 2020
Obama admits it: Riots and protests are ‘tailor-made’ for electing Joe Biden
Joe Biden is hiding in his basement, but maybe that’s because the rabid-left looters, rioters, and protesters are carrying out his presidential campaign just fine for him.
What else can be concluded but that, given that President Obama has cynically admitted that the civil unrest covering the U.S. is “tailor-made” for electing Joe Biden?
Here’s a report from National Review:
Former President Barack Obama told aides this month that the nationwide protests following the death of George Floyd are “a tailor-made moment” to help his former vice president Joe Biden defeat Donald Trump in November.
According to a New York Times story based on interviews with more than 50 Obama confidants, the former president was made anxious after riots and looting rocked many American cities in the days following Floyd’s death and Trump began trumpeting “law and order” in response.
“Let’s not excuse violence, or rationalize it, or participate in it. If we want our criminal justice system, and American society at large, to operate on a higher ethical code, then we have to model that code ourselves,” Obama wrote in a Medium post earlier this month.
But Obama’s confidence has since grown as the protests have continued and Trump’s polling numbers have dipped.
So in other words, more riots, more votes for Biden. Perhaps the idea is to beat the public down to such an extent that it feels that only a Democrat can solve it. Perhaps he sees in the polls that the public is blaming Trump.
The New York Times reported just a couple days ago that Obama is obsessed with ousting President Trump. That being the case, it’s not unlikely that he will continue with his old Alinsky training, to oust Trump by any means necessary.
If riots will do it, Obama and his Democrats will be happy with more riots. Even the New York Times admitted that the riots excited him:
That calculus, though, may be changing in the wake of George Floyd’s killing by the police in Minneapolis. As America’s first black president, now its first black ex-president, Mr. Obama sees the current social and racial awakening as an opportunity to elevate a 2020 election dictated by Mr. Trump’s mud-wrestling style into something more meaningful — to channel a new, youthful movement toward a political aim, as he did in 2008.
Opportunity? Elevate? That sounds a lot like “tailor-made.”
This ought to be a wake-up call to voters, who are the only ones who can stop this cynical, diabolical plan on property-owners. Obama has a stake and interest in perpetrating riots and lootings, regardless of the cost to the little guy, because it advances his political aims. That’s in characters, from the words of his former chief of staff, Rahm Emanuel, to “never let a crisis go to waste.”
It’s also amazingly cynical, given that nobody should be rooting for rioters as a means of benefiting politically. Yet here we are, and Obama is being lionized. It calls to mind that the Obama legacy can’t be hosed out soon enough by Trump in his second term.
June 30, 2020
Time to Expose the Fraud That Launched BLM
On Black Lives Matter’s website, the organization’s radical founders trace the creation of their movement “to the acquittal of Trayvon Martin’s murderer, George Zimmerman.”
Had those founders paid any attention to the trial, they would have known that Zimmerman should never have been charged with murder, let alone tried. The fact that he was arrested can be attributed to a stunningly blatant fraud orchestrated by the attorney who has been prominently milking the racial divide he helped create, Benjamin Crump.
As it happens, the one person capable of exposing this fraud is George Zimmerman. All Zimmerman needs is his own Atticus Finch, an attorney brave enough to resist the howling mob and stand up for the truth.
In the way of background, Zimmerman has filed a suit in the Circuit Court of Florida’s Tenth Judicial Circuit. The evidence is overwhelming that Trayvon Martin’s support team, including Martin’s parents and their attorney, Benjamin Crump, knowingly substituted an imposter witness for the real “phone witness” in order to secure Zimmerman’s arrest for the 2012 shooting death of Martin.
Also named in the suit are the Florida Department of Law Enforcement (FDLE); the State of Florida; former state attorneys Bernie de la Rionda, John Guy, and Angela Corey, and HarperCollins, the publisher of Crump’s defamatory book, Open Season: Legalized Genocide of Colored People.
In a 2012 deposition, the perjured testimony of the imposter in question, Rachel Jeantel, enabled the State of Florida to arrest Zimmerman and take him to trial. Evidence strongly suggests that state attorneys knew that the witness was a fraud.
Zimmerman was inspired to launch the suit based on the dogged research done by Los Angeles filmmaker Joel Gilbert for his documentary film and book of the same name, The Trayvon Hoax: Unmasking the Witness Fraud that Divided America.
Attorney Larry Klayman was brave enough to file the suit, but Zimmerman has parted ways with him and is now seeking a Florida attorney with a strong knowledge of state procedures to push the suit through to its conclusion.
The defendants effectively ruined Zimmerman’s life on April 2, 2012, five weeks after the shooting. On that fateful day, de la Rionda flew to Miami from Jacksonville to depose Brittany “Diamond” Eugene, the girl who was on the phone with Trayvon up to the moment of his death.
Trayvon’s mother, Sybrina Fulton, had met with the real Diamond Eugene at least once before in mid-March. Crump may have met with her as well. He certainly coached her to follow his fraudulent script of a raging Zimmerman stalking and killing the scared little boy Trayvon Martin. His phone interview with Diamond was recorded by ABC’s Matt Gutman and broadcast.
On April 2, when Fulton drove with de la Rionda to Diamond’s home, they were redirected to another address. “I knocked on the door and asked for Diamond,” Fulton said in a 2013 deposition. According to the lawsuit, “[r]ather than Defendant Eugene coming to the door, Defendant Jeantel appeared and claimed that she was ‘Diamond Eugene.'”
In The Trayvon Hoax, Gilbert did a brilliant job identifying and locating the real Diamond Eugene, a then-16-year-old Haitian-American hottie who stole Trayvon’s heart.
State attorneys had full access to the steamy text exchanges between Diamond and Trayvon, many of which had photos attached. Reads the suit, “Defendant Eugene could in no way be mistaken for Defendant Jeantel, who was 2 years older, 5 inches taller, and about 120 pounds heavier than Defendant Eugene.” While we are on the subject of height, little Trayvon was about half a foot taller than Zimmerman.
There is overwhelming evidence that Crump orchestrated the witness switch when the real Diamond refused to lie under oath. Someone then recruited Diamond’s mentally challenged half-sister, Jeantel, to pretend to be Diamond.
Of all those being sued, it is only Sybrina Fulton who provably knew that Jeantel was an imposter. Fulton is running for commissioner in Miami-Dade County with Hillary Clinton’s open support.
As Trayvon’s mother, Fulton has emerged as something of an icon in national Democratic politics. The media have done everything possible to protect not just Fulton, despite her obvious involvement, but the entire phony narrative. The response of the Miami Herald to this scandal has been nothing short of disgraceful.
Zimmerman remains impressively upbeat. Although “disheartened to see Crump using the same playbook to divide the country,” he has been encouraged by the response to the Trayvon Hoax film since Gilbert put it up for free on YouTube.
“My faith in humanity has been restored by reading the comments on Joel’s movie,” Zimmerman told me recently. He particularly appreciates hearing from young people whose minds have been changed from watching the film. Some sample responses:
I had thought Zimmerman was the man the media made him out to be. Thank god, you made an excellent documentary with much class & dignity. Thank you for showing up & balancing the real scales of justice. Wow.
20 min in and I’m mad as s—, and I’m black.
Wow, I am in complete shock! Thank you!
I’m black and I knew something was up. I couldn’t find enough information on the case. This is amazing, thanks man, I’ve been trying to convince people it was self defense, they won’t listen.
I thought I had made it to the peak of my disgust for the media’s blatant lies, but this, this is a WHOLE new level!! This is BETRAYAL to a young black man traumatized by the fear-mongering pushed out as a result of this case, and indoctrinated at TWELVE YEARS OLD with the idea that I was being “hunted down everywhere I went” because of my race. BETRAYAL!!.
The last quote nails it. One brave attorney can help undo the racial madness into which much of this country has descended since the death of Trayvon Martin. If interested, please contact email@example.com.
Biden Shows Us – Again – That He Is Not Alright; Australian Billionaire Thinks He Has Alzheimer’s
Back in the safety of his basement bunker, presumptive Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden delivered additional evidence that he is not fit to serve as Commander-in-Chief.
In the brief clip below, #BarelyThereBiden confuses President Obama with President Trump. Biden looks old and feeble and speaks in slow, halting speech. He tells his audience, “People..have watched my..me on television. And they’ve watched and the more that Barack, the more that – excuse me – Donald Trump is out…”
WATCH: Joe Biden confuses Barack Obama with President Trump. #BarelyThereBiden pic.twitter.com/U2pQWKL66Z
— Trump War Room – Text TRUMP to 88022 (@TrumpWarRoom) June 27, 2020
Given Biden’s obvious slide into dementia, his commanding lead in both national and critical battleground polls defies logic. Clearly the Democrats’ intention is to utilize Biden as a mere figurehead, but there will be occasions where he will be forced to speak. Can you imagine this man representing the United States overseas? Can you envision what a meeting between Biden and Putin or Kim Jong Un might look like?
As Democrats continue to ignore and, when pressed, to deny Biden’s current cognitive decline, the brief clip below offers a glimpse of how foreigners view his condition. A Sky News Australia reporter asks billionaire Clive Palmer if he thinks Trump will win reelection.
Palmer, who believes Biden has Alzheimer’s, replies:
I think when he goes into a debate with Joe Biden and poor old Joe can’t remember where he is…I think Trump will romp him. Because it’s quite incredible that the Democrats have endorsed someone that does have Alzheimer’s disease I believe. He doesn’t know where he is half the time. And he’s not going to be very effective as a President, so I think that’ll come out and I think that’s what will happen. It is interesting to note at this time in the election cycle, Hillary was 12 points ahead of Trump. This time Joe Biden’s allegedly 4% ahead of Hillary, so Trump’s doing a lot better now than he was back then and he still won.
I have no idea if Biden is suffering from Alzheimer’s or dementia, but the Democrats’ determination to prop him up as he continues to deteriorate noticeably from one month to the next, is not only cruel and unusual punishment, but the ultimate act of putting politics ahead of the welfare of our nation.
WaPo Tried to Fact-Check Trump on Who Runs the Dangerous Cities… and Failed Miserably
Democrats now risk losing the high ground on police reform, and the media has chosen to step in and play defense for them. Which is exactly what Philip Bump of the Washington Post did. According to Bump, President Trump’s claim is dead wrong. “Trump keeps claiming that the most dangerous cities in America are all run by Democrats. They aren’t,” reads the headline of his fact check.
With a headline like this, certainly, Mr. Bump was going to provide us with statistics or a chart that showed that the most violent cities in America are somewhat more evenly controlled by Democrats and Republicans. If you thought that, you’d be wrong.
In fact, despite the fact check’s headline, here’s what Bump says:
The most recent data to that effect is from the FBI’s Uniform Crime Report covering the first half of 2019. The cities with the most violent crimes are many of the most populous cities in the country, as you might expect. Those with the highest rates of violent crime are from a range of different states.
Most of the current mayors of these cities are Democrats. Two of the mayors of cities with the most reported violent crimes overall, though, are independents and one, the mayor of Jacksonville, Fla., is a Republican. Among the 20 cities with the most violent crime per capita, one isn’t a Democrat: the independent mayor of Springfield, Mo.
Bump showed this data graphically in the chart below:
According to @pbump of @washingtonpost these charts prove that @realDonaldTrump is wrong to say the most violent cities in America are run by Democrats. #facepalm pic.twitter.com/8HrSEzCR8h
— Matt Margolis 🇺🇸 (@mattmargolis) June 27, 2020
This, according to Bump, totally debunks Trump’s claim, and claims Trump would “no doubt shrug at that detail, decrying as ‘fake news’ the revelation that his assertion was only slightly wrong.”
So, by this standard, because only 17 out of 20 of the most violent cities are run by Democrats, or 19 out of 20 of the most violent cities per capita are run by Democrats, Trump’s oft-repeated claim that the most dangerous cities in the country are run by Democrats is false.
And we’re supposed to believe that the Washington Post isn’t biased? How does someone like Philip Bump still have a job after basically trying to argue that two plus two equals five?
Bump then bloviates about why it doesn’t matter than an overwhelming majority of these violent cities are run by Democrats. “In fairness, it actually doesn’t matter that four of the 32 cities listed above have non-Democratic mayors — because it doesn’t really matter that the other mayors are Democrats.”
Of course, it doesn’t! He just spent several paragraphs claiming to disprove that very point, and yet, he now claims it doesn’t matter. Why? Because it’s only a coincidence that these urban areas are typically run by Democrats… and have been for years.
Is it really that hard for the media to admit when Trump is right? How many bogus fact checks does it take for a so-called journalist to be embarrassed?
June 27, 2020
Strzok’s notes implicate Obama
I am an accomplished note-taker. When you take copious notes, you sometimes lose the grammar or skip words to capture content.
Below is the transcription of Peter Strzok’s notes related to him by FBI director Comey about the January 5, 2017, Oval Office meeting on what to do about Michael Flynn that has been widely accepted by the media.
VP: ‘Logan Act,’
P: These are unusual times.
VP: I’ve been on intel committee for ten years and I never.
P: Make sure you look over things and have the right people on it.
P: Is there anything I shouldn’t be telling the transition team?
Now let us look at it in a different way.
VP: Logan Act?
P: These are unusual times.
VP: I’ve been on intel committee for ten years and I never… [as in heard it used before].
P: Make sure you look over things and have the right people on it.
P: Is there anything I shouldn’t be telling the transition team?
It changes everything, doesn’t it?
Someone, probably Barack Obama, since this is a short conversation between B.O. and J.B., says:
“Let’s get him on the Logan Act.”Biden asks, “Logan Act?
Obama answers, “These are unusual times.”
Biden counters, “I’ve been on intel committee for ten years and I never…”
Obama tasks others in the meeting: “Make sure you look over things and have the right people on it.”
And then asks, “Is there anything I shouldn’t be telling the transition team?”
You see, it is all in the grammar.
This interpretation links Barack Obama to the attempted coup. Their interpretation suggests Biden bringing up the Logan Act.
When you change the grammar, Biden is in a short conversation with Obama, and Biden is questioning the suggestion that they use the Logan Act to get Flynn.
Even had Obama not been the person suggesting the Logan Act, he would still be implicated in the scheme by directing others to use it.
June 26, 2020
The DNC panic is palpable
Circumventing the rigors of election campaigning and hiding Joe Biden from the American public, the DNC just announced there won’t be a large Democrat conclave in August, blaming the COVID-19 pandemic. Going forward, Mr. Biden will continue a tightly controlled, wholly scripted campaign from the basement of his Delaware home, concluding with a “virtual” nomination. Upon affirmation, he will then travel to Milwaukee to deliver his acceptance speech to an empty arena. In fact, Tom Perez, DNC chairman, informed the delegates they aren’t welcome in Wisconsin. And while the DNC isn’t planning to completely scrap the entirety of their convention programming, his fear is palpable and most likely attributed to the likelihood of convention rioting, Mr. Biden’s declining mental acuity, and the untimely rise of the angry Marxist mob.
Undoubtedly, Tom Perez wants to avoid an encore performance of the disastrous 1968 Democrat Convention, at which fierce rioting just outside the convention hall in Chicago overshadowed the nomination of Herbert Hoover and permeated the nightly news broadcasts. Democrats had already suffered two major political setbacks prior to the start of their 1968 convention: incumbent President Lyndon Johnson’s declining to run again for office in March and the assassination of party favorite Robert Kennedy in June. By August, there was no clear frontrunner for the top of the Democrat ticket, and the virulent Vietnam antiwar protest sentiments spilled out onto the convention floor. Given the current unrest in America, punctuated by nightly rioting in America’s major cities, monument defacement, statue-toppling, and extreme far-left violence, the timing is ripe for all-out warfare on the streets of Milwaukee. Understandably, the Democrats want to prevent bad optics while camouflaging the awkward handicap of presumptive nominee Joe Biden.
The DNC and the liberal fake news media have tried their best to provide cover for Mr. Biden. Sadly, their herculean efforts have been in vain, insomuch as every videoed speaking engagement, whether live from the Biden basement or a previously taped segment, exposes more proof of the ugly truth: Joe Biden is suffering from obvious, unmistakable mental decline. He frequently stammers and stutters, his speech patterns are hard to follow, he appears confused on camera, he’s unable to answer simple questions coherently, and he often wanders off into the word salad weed patch. In a candid moment, former Virginia governor Terry McAuliffe remarked during a Democrat operative teleconference that Joe Biden ought to remain in his basement until November. McAuliffe also said the Democrats would prefer it that way — not exactly a vote of confidence, nor a ringing endorsement of their candidate.
McAuliffe’s off-the-cuff assessment of Biden’s declining mental acuity is also shared by a majority of a thousand likely voters in a recent poll taken by Zogby Analytics. Asked if they thought Mr. Biden was suffering the early stages of dementia, 55% of respondents said “yes.” Extrapolating the numbers, 77% of the people who identified as Republicans absolutely agreed that Biden has early-onset dementia, while 56% of independents also think so. Surprisingly, one third of the Democrats polled recognize the symptoms of dementia in their presumptive candidate; however, they will vote for Biden regardless.
If those numbers don’t cause concern for Biden’s campaign team, the Democrat number-crunchers ought to be paying attention to the 60% of those polled between the ages of 18 and 29, who also think Biden is suffering diminished mental acuity. More troubling is the belief that there will be an overwhelming turnout for Democrats of BLM and Antifa voters. Nothing could be farther from the truth. The targeted violence, trashing of liberal enclaves in Democrat-run cities, and nightly riots since May signals one thing: anarchy and the growing anger of Marxist malcontents in America, who have stated emphatically that an overthrow of the U.S. government is necessary for change. Translated, the Marxist mob is willing to wage a violent revolution in order to oust the two-party American system of government. Not mincing words, BLM president and co-founder Hawk Newsome made it very clear, telling Fox News host Martha MacCallum, “If this country doesn’t give us what we want, then we will burn down the system and replace it,” which doesn’t sound like a guaranteed vote for Joe Biden, nor does it signal that BLM and Antifa are on board with the Democrats. It’s no wonder that Tom Perez is afraid.
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia ruled 2-1 Wednesday that a lower court must grant a request by the Department of Justice (DOJ) to drop its case against former National Security Adviser Lt. Gen. Michael Flynn (Ret.).
Flynn won his request for a writ of mandamus ordering Judge Emmet Sullivan to grant the DOJ’s motion last month.
The appeals court order states:
Upon consideration of the emergency petition for a writ of mandamus, the responses thereto, and the reply, the briefs of amici curiae in support of the parties, and the argument by counsel, it is ORDERED that Flynn’s petition for a writ of mandamus be granted in part; the District Court is directed to grant the government’s Rule 48(a) motion to dismiss; and the District Court’s order appointing an amicus is hereby vacated as moot, in accordance with the opinion of the court filed herein this date.
The appeals court judges in the case were: Karen Henderson, Robert Wilkins and Neomi Rao. Wilkins is a former President Obama appointee, Rao is a President Trump appointee, and Henderson is a former President George H.W. Bush appointee.
BREAKING – DC Circuit Court of Appeals rules Michael Flynn case can end and DOJ’s request to drop charges be accepted by the federal district court. pic.twitter.com/qPWmyZlO6M
— Darren Samuelsohn (@dsamuelsohn) June 24, 2020
Rao states in her majority decision:
[T]his is plainly not the rare case where further judicial inquiry is warranted. To begin with, Flynn agrees with the government’s motion to dismiss, and there has been no allegation that the motion reflects prosecutorial harassment. Additionally, the government’s motion includes an extensive discussion of newly discovered evidence casting Flynn’s guilt into doubt.
Rao’s opinion also makes a constitutional point: “The circumstances of this case demonstrate that mandamus is appropriate to prevent the judicial usurpation of executive power.”
The order also prevents Judge Sullivan from hearing amicus curiae (“friend of the court”) briefs in the case. Sullivan had appointed retired Judge John Gleeson, who had criticized the Trump administration, to argue against dismissing the case.
The court did deny Flynn’s request to have the case reassigned from Sullivan to another judge.
The ruling by the appeals court is a major victory for Flynn and attorney Sidney Powell, and a defeat for Special Counsel Robert Mueller, former FBI Director James Comes, and “deep state” partisans who had sought to convict Flynn in their pursuit of false allegations of “Russian collusion” against President Donald Trump and his 2016 presidential campaign.
Flynn had pleaded guilty of lying to the FBI in 2017, though the FBI itself believed he had not done so. He was allegedly pressured to offer a guilty plea. The FBI was forced to reveal exculpatory evidence after Attorney General William Barr assigned U.S. Attorney Jeffrey Jensen to review irregularities in the case earlier this year.
Left-wing comedian Jimmy Kimmel, who has repeatedly slammed President Trump and his aides as racists, used the N-word six times during a comedy sketch and frequently used ebonics to imitate a “crazy black voice.”
Kimmel admitted in a 2013 podcast with Adam Carolla that he had used the N-word several times while imitating rapper Snoop Dogg and black comedian George Wallace.
In the podcast, Kimmel also revealed that he imitated black people on many other occasions for laughs. Fox News reported:
“Fox News additionally has obtained audio from the Christmas album, “A Family Christmas In Your A–.” In the Christmas track, a singer mentioned a “fat n—- in a sleigh giving sh— away,” referring to Santa Claus.
The song also referenced “n—– in the manger,” including associates of King Herod.
“Me and my n—– down in LBC, we’ll smoke that motherf—— Christmas tree,” Kimmel said.
According to the liner notes from the cassette, the album with the racist material was co-produced by “Jim Kimmel” and credited Kimmel for all “comedy material” on the album. …
As statues continue to be pulled down, buildings and vehicles continue to be targeted, and police remain under attack by angry rioters, it is important to speak softly and carry a good gun.
The point is not about carrying a gun for offensive purposes but carrying one for self-defense, for ourselves and our families, just as our Founding Fathers intended when they wrote the Second Amendment.
If you think I am forcing my own meaning on the Second Amendment please consider Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito’s majority opinion in McDonald v. Chicago (2010). Alito took the opportunity of writing that opinion to stress that “self-defense” is “the central component” of the Second Amendment.
My mind was drawn to this important topic on Monday when Rush Limbaugh Show guest host Ken Matthews described the Second Amendment as a safeguard for rights that allow the weak to defend themselves when stronger or more numerous individuals attack.
He said, “I always joke that people are so polite at a gun range. And they are. You know why? Because everybody is equal.”
You want an equalizer, just take the Bill of Rights. That is a great equalizer … for any body, regardless of color or gender, that is the true equalizer. The Second Amendment, the right to bear arms, the First Amendment, free speech, free assembly, freedom to protest peacefully, freedom to worship who you want, everyone should have that right. Yet, when you go to some of these cities, some of these places that are burning to the ground are “gun-free zones.”
Matthews then highlighted the gun laws in New York City, California, and other Democrat-run areas, noting that law-abiding citizens in those places have seen their Second Amendment rights curtailed.
Chicago is a Democrat-run city in a state full of gun control, yet Breitbart News reported that 100 people were shot in Chicago over Father’s Day Weekend 2020 alone. Fourteen of those victims died from their wounds.
When police are minutes away, maybe more, the self-defense tools you have within arms reach are all you count on.
The Second Amendment is a bulwark for law-abiding citizens in days such as these, especially in locations where the threat of violence in the air is palpable and single mothers fear for their children, older citizens are too afraid to go to the store, and almost anyone thinks twice before venturing out alone.
Gun sales — particularly handgun sales — are through the roof because people are seeking a means of self-defense.
If you are among those rushing to the store for a gun, be sure to get a good one and carry it softly. By that I mean, do not buy one to be an aggressor or agitator, buy one to keep close at hand so you can defend your life and the lives of your family if trouble descends upon you in these crazy times. Follow the laws of your state and take the gun to the range so you are familiar with it and can depend on it if under duress.